Team Chevelle banner

upgrade from 325 horsepower to 360 or greater

22K views 30 replies 21 participants last post by  ddeennis  
#1 ·
i have a 396 chevelle with 325 hp. i would like to increase the power but i do not want to change the heads. what cam would work best for this. i would also be willing to change the carburetor if this would help. i have already ordered my headers. any help would be appreciated
 
#31 ·
I read this post and my mind takes me back to the day when I first got a bbc 396, all hung up on the "stock" specs of this and that gross and net this or that cam makes this much.

Zoom forward 22 years and I will tell you this none of it makes a difference unless you dead set on a number matching engine for a numbers matching car.

Bottom line a 396 needs convertor 2500 plus, 10 to 1 compression and decent 230/240 @ .050" cam, some stock ported heads, small tubed headers, dialed in timing curve and some RPMS to make decent power.

After several years and many combos this is my list for minimum requirements, I have spent to many days at the track with under performer combos that just don't put enough power out.

I comes to this you need to turn up the rpms to get decent hp out of a 396
 
#30 ·
While i am back here i forgot to also rec installing a lrger higher flow .135" needle & seat to replace stock for bbc .125" needle & seat and a lighter fuel pump rod.

You can run the carb out of fuel smaller needle & seat setup & i have also found the heavy stock pump rod in soime cases can cause stock f-pump with lighter pump are spring to float at 4500-5k rpm reducing fuel flow to carb which is an issue with perf cams running up to 5,500-5,600rpm.

And today some rbld kits actually have an even smaller .110" needle & seat SBC used.

Scott
 
#29 ·
========

I am aware of that,it was a typo on my part,but thanks for pointing it out.
scott
 
#23 ·
The Cam specs for the FT hyd cam GM used in stock 396/325hp & 350hp & 360hp (1 yr only),402/350hp,427/385hp,390hp,LS5 454 365hp & 390hp,among a few other bbc's is:

214 int/218 ex deg dur @ .05,.461"/.480 gross lift,on i believe a 115 deg LSA.

Even though porting the heads would nice its expensive and not nededed a all to inc perf he quite a bit.

Since the stock 396/325 hp motor has decent lrg oval port heads with small chambers for decent 10.25.1 comp in stock form if his motors in good cond not using much oil with good compression all he has to do is :

* INSTALL AN AFTERMARKET HYD FT PERF CAM (with proper matching springs & retainers,maybe valve seals while your at it too) THATS MORE CAM THEN STOCK 396/350HP & 360HP HAD IN APPROX RANGE OF 218-224 INT/226-230 EXT DEG DUR @.05,.510"-.520" /.530"-.540" GROSS LIFT ON A 110-112 DEG LSA .

With a properly dialed in dist/timing curve a cam in that range will still be very streetable and idle decent in a smaller 396-402cid bbc motor.

* SETUP MECH ADV IN DIST FOR 18 DEG MECH ADV ALL IN BY APPROX 2500-2600RPM MAX.
TO RUN WITH APPROX 18 DEG BASE TIMING THE AFTERMARKET PERF CAM NEEDS.

THEN YOU HAVE 18 DEG BASE TIMING + 18 DEG TIMING FROM MECH ADV IN DIST = 36 DEG TOTAL. THATS A GOOD PLACE TO START FOR A STREET PERF TIMING CURVE WITH A CAM IN THAT RANGE THAT SHOULD RUN WELL RIGHT OUT OF THE BOX ONLY NEEDING TO TWEAK THE TIMING A COUPLE DEG EITHER WAY TO FIND THE SWEET SPOT.

* RUN A VAC ADV LIMITED TO A MAX OF 10-12 DEG & HOOK IT TO FULL INT VACUUME TOO.

* TWEAK/ADJ THE Q-JET FOR BEST PERF ESPCIALLY WHEN IT COMES TO PROPERLY ADJ SECONDARY UPPER AIR VALVE SPRING TENSION TO ENSURE ITS OPENING FULLY AT THE PROPER RPM AND THAT THE LOWER MECHANICALY OPERATED SECONDARY THROTTLE PLATES IN CARB BASEPLATE ARE ALSO OPENING FULLY TOO.

* INSTALL HEADERS (OR EXTRUDE HONED EX MANIFOLDS IF YOU DOINT WANT TO RUN HEADERS) ALONG WITH GOOD FLOWING MUFFLERS AND 2.5" MANDRELL BENT EX PIPES & TAILPIPES TO ENSURE GOOD BREATHING ON EX SIDE OF THE MOTOR.

Doing all the above (esp using a cam in range i suggested thats larger then stock 396/350 & 360hp cam is along with headers & good breathing ex system) should increase your 396 from its stock 325hp/415lbs trq rating to roughly 365-370hp/430-440lbs trq without removing heads for expensive porting though it could add an additional 25-30hp ro a bit more .

I have done this type mod to quite a few stock 396-402bbC's like yours over the yrs and it really wakes them up when done properly esp when running man trans and decent street perf gear with reasonable cruise rpm like 3.31 or even 3.42 if running non OD old school 4spd trans.

With a 5 spd man trans or Od auto trans then you can run 3.55-3.73 gear for more getup 7 go .

Scott
 
#22 ·
From a 1970 Motors Auto Repair Manual I found some information;
It state's that valves spring installed height is 1.88 for 2 396's listed in 1966.
spring pressure psi

325 hp = 220@ 1.46"
360 hp = 315@ 1.38"
It skip's the shp engine but list's the 427's spring pressures at the same as the 360 hp 396 however the 390 hp is hyd and the 425 hp is naturally a sft but according to this book keeps the same spring pressure as the 360hp 396.
 
#21 ·
i have a 396 chevelle with 325 hp.
i would like to increase the power but i do not want to change the heads. what cam would work best for this.
I had a stock 1967 325 HP 396 that ran mid 12's (12.45 @ 107 MPH was its best)
....... with just a 240°/246° @ .050 .517/.530 114° LSA cam, RPM intake, and an 850 BG.
Heads where stock, other than valve job and new guides ...
You will be amazed at the power change after changing just the cam, on a mild to medium street car.
I ran a Comp Cam in my 396/402. Very nice match for a 9.0-10.0:1 engine. The first one I ran was an off the shelf cam with 110° LSA. My heads had been shaved about .030-.040 and I had decent P-V clearance.
Here is my old combo:

Engine
402 BBC
Competition Cams Xtreme solid roller cam XR274R (236°/242° @.050 .639/.646 lift, 108° LSA)
GM iron oval port heads (Casting # 3904390) with (2.06 Intake/1.72 Exhaust) valves
I'd go smaller on the duration.
I have the 60212 that UDHarold recommended and he had it custom ground on a billet core @ 112° LSA for my 10.25 compression 408 BBC. It pulls 12-13 inches of idle vacuum @ 900 rpm. I have my shift light set @ 6K and with my slow reactions I am probably shifting @ 6300 rpm. It pulls hard and has never nosed over. Harold said it would pull well over 6000 rpm and he was right. It also has great street manners. This cam works great with the combination on my baby rat.

1971 model LS3 402 bored .030 over -to- 408 2 bolt block w/ARP studded mains
Heads cast #049's w/2.19/1.88 stainless valves
UDHarold billet hyd. roller cam 282/290 231°/239° @ .050 .600 Lift 112° LSA = Range 2500-6500
here is a short video of my car at idle with the UDHarold billet hyd. roller cam, described earlier.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oSU49uiCAro&feature=youtu.be
Decent heads, small 414 CID BBC, rpm to 6000 to 6200 ...... Small camshaft is needed.
At 414 CID, this is 50/80 CID cubes smaller than most & doesn't need a large cam.
VORTECPRO uses this Isky Z55 solid lifter flat-tappet cam, on his 468 CID engines ... (254°@.050, .590 lift, 108*)
with excellent repeatable results, especially when using his ported #781 iron heads.
I'd recommend a roller cam, just don't go overboard on duration @.050 ...
In "generic" terms when comparing lobes for flat tappets and lobes for roller tappets the flats are about 18° degrees more ... So say you have a flat tappet cam that is 238° @ .050". The equal cam in a roller is around 220° @ .050".
This is for anyone that would be interested in an "apples-to-apples" test involving a "cam only" swap from a straight hydraulic over to a retro-hydraulic roller.

This is about as valid of a test as can be done with the ONLY change being a "swap" from the "flat-tappet" to the "hydraulic-roller". Both cams had identical (for the most part) specs as below.

The "flat-tappet" piece was a "Blue-Racer" #WG987 - 222*/235* x .500"/.505" x 114*LS (inst. @ 110C/L).

The "retro" piece was a Comp 11-000-9 (custom) - 224*/230* x .511" x 110LS (inst. @ 110C/L).

After the final "pulls" we figured there MAY have been some very slight variation in numbers for the specs, BUT, we allowed for that in our final assumption!

My customer walked in, contracted for a 396" unit with the "flat-tappet" hydraulic and decided AFTER the dyno session to go for a change to the "retro". This he decided after the initial dyno results, so we "cut him a deal"!

We offered him the opportunity to purchase the components required for the "swap" and do it right on the dyno with a 50% reduction in the labor rate. Never left the room!

Changed the cam, springs, pushrods, and set up the button. Run the test again.

The unit was a 408" BB. Steel crank.

1-Cast piston, 9.25:1 C.R., 3/8" stock "pressed" rods, E243K S.P. rings. (Gaps .032" / .020")

2-Stock #390 "oval" heads. 2.125" x .343" intakes/1.720" x .375" exhausts - Exhaust inserts.
(No porting/gasket matching whatsoever on this build. We were NOT chasing power!)

3-Holley (cast-iron) intake, and some Comp 1320 rockers. Both platforms used 3/8" pushrods.

The initial cam setup, the "hydraulic", made 405# T @ 3850 and 351 HP @ 5650.
The swap to the "retro" setup gave us 414# T @ 3800 and 380 HP @ 5600.

This is the only time I can recall a "heads-up" swap like this from all the past years builds where HP was no concern. In other words, we didn't change the cam in search of HP. The customer was merely anticipating a future cam failure due to the oil "dilemma"!!!!

Thanks, Gary in N.Y.

P.S. We found the end result here slightly surprising. We estimate an actual increase of about 25/30 HP or thereabouts! At least on this particular unit.
 
#18 ·
Irlene,You have what I started out with. My upgrades are:Hedman Elites with a custom exhaust,702's with nice valve job with a little bowl work and clean up,3310 750 Holley,Isky 270 Megacam,all Isky valve train components. This put me past where you want to go. I still have a C-396 intake to install in the next few weeks...Bob
 
#17 ·
Irlene, if money is available, I would remove the heads, have them ported - valves enlarged by someone with a reputation, adn then add a hydraulic roller cam. You can get with Chris Straub if you prefer to leave the cam selection to a professional.

WARNING! this will set you back near 2K.

Between the fresh valve job, porting, bigger valves and esp the cam, you ought gain a ton of TQ/hp and still be able to use the original qJet.

You'll have to get rid of the tiny hole snorkel air cleaner lid though. That is made for the stock .385 lift camshaft!
 
#20 ·
...add a hydraulic roller cam. You can get with Chris Straub if you prefer to leave the cam selection to a professional.

WARNING! this will set you back near 2K.
X2. You will be amazed at the power change after changing just the cam, assuming your carb and distrib are optimized. I'd spend my money on the carb and distrib well before headers on a mild to medium street car.
 
#15 ·
what year
what weight
what gear
trans and converter/4-speed info M-20/M-21
what are you looking for with your modifications
do you require stock looks under the hood
who is doing the parts swaps for you?

pics of your car, underhood etc will help a lot
 
#13 ·
The 360 hp and 350 hp 396 are practically the same engine from 66-67. The 350/360 hp 396's and 385/390/400 hp 427'S and 270/365/360/390 hp 454 all used the same cam.

The 265/325 396's and 240/300/310/330 hp 402's and 335 hp 427's 235/245/275/345 hp LS-4 454'S had the baby cam with .398 lift.
 
#19 ·
The 360 hp and 350 hp 396 are practically the same engine from 1966-67.

The 350/360 hp 396's -and- 385/390/400 hp 427's -and- 270/365/360/390 hp 454's ... all used the same cam.

265/325hp 396's -and- 240/300/310/330hp 402's -and- 335hp/427's -and- 235/245/275/345hp LS-4 454's
......... had the baby cam with .398 lift.
Yes 350 and 360 hp 396's had the same cam specs as the 385, 390, and 400 hp 427's. Also the LS5 454's.
I agree, it appears, some 1965-69 396/427 low-horsepower engines used this type cam.
Camshaft number = #3874872
Camshaft Intake duration @ .050" == 196°
Camshaft Exhaust duration @ .050" = 196°
Camshaft lift - Intake == 0.398"
Camshaft lift - Exhaust = 0.398"
@ 114° LSA
__________________________________________

I believe these are the correct camshaft specs, for a 1970 Chevrolet 454 w/LS4.
Camshaft number = #3963544
Camshaft Intake duration @ .050" == 192°
Camshaft Exhaust duration @ .050" = 203°
Camshaft lift - Intake == 0.398"
Camshaft lift - Exhaust = 0.430"
@ 111° LSA

1970 Chevrolet 454 w/LS4 engine.
C.R. = 10.25:1
Horsepower = 345 @ 4400
Torque = 500 @ 3000
__________________________________________

I've seen these cam specs listed for the 1973 Corvette 454 w/LS4 engine.
Camshaft number = #353040
Camshaft Intake duration @ .050" == 210°
Camshaft Exhaust duration @ .050" = 213°
Camshaft lift - Intake == 0.398"
Camshaft lift - Exhaust = 0.430"
@ 113° LSA

1973 Corvette 454 w/LS4 engine.
C.R. = 8.25:1
Horsepower = 275 @ 4400
Torque = 395 @ 2800
__________________________________________

I believe these are the correct camshaft specs, for a 1970 Chevrolet 454 w/LS5.
The duration figures, which are taken at .008-inch lift are 268° int./ 274° exh.
Camshaft number = #3883986
Camshaft Intake duration @ .050" == 214°
Camshaft Exhaust duration @ .050" = 218°
Camshaft lift - Intake == 0.461"
Camshaft lift - Exhaust = 0.480"
@ 115° LSA

1970 Chevrolet 454 w/LS5 engine.
C.R. = 10.25:1
Horsepower = 360 @ 5400
Torque = 500 @ 3200

1970 Chevrolet 402 w/L34 engine.
C.R. = 10.25:1
Horsepower = 350 @ 5200
Torque = 415 @ 3400
__________________________________________

I believe these are the correct camshaft specs, for a 1970 Chevrolet 454 w/LS6.
Camshaft number = #3863148
Camshaft Intake duration @ .050" == 242°
Camshaft Exhaust duration @ .050" = 242°
Camshaft lift - Intake == 0.520"
Camshaft lift - Exhaust = 0.520"
@ 114° LSA

1970 Chevrolet 454 w/LS6 engine.
C.R. = 11.25:1
Horsepower = 450 @ 5600
Torque = 500 @ 3600

1970 Chevrolet 402 w/L78 engine.
C.R. = 11.25:1
Horsepower = 375 @ 5600
Torque = 415 @ 3600
Now, everyone will know.. The 1970 LS6 #291's were the last square port closed chamber heads produced.

They're easy to spot by the casting mark on the front of the head. A raised 1/2 oval right at the front casting seam.
They are very prominent and can be spotted standing 10 feet away from the car. :thumbsup:

:D The #291's were the last Closed Chamber Head, and the only heads used on the production LS6's,
#990's were service replacement and used on some crate LS6's.
As for the bare block itself, the two are similar with the 1971 block having a tall distributor tower where the 1972 and later blocks have a short distributor tower boss in the intake area.

1972 was also the last year the 454 had an LS5 RPO code, later 454s were RPO LS4.

FWIW, the short block assemblies also differed.
The LS5 had a compression ratio of 9.00:1 where the LS4 dropped to 8.25:1 and had a milder camshaft, .2741/.2824 I/E to the LS4s .2588 on both intake and exhaust. So it's not just the heads, carburetion and other minor items that accounted for the change. 1972 also saw hp ratings change from gross hp to net hp.
That's one big reason you see a drop from the 365hp LS5 in 1971 to the 270hp LS5 in 1972.
the 1972 402/LS3 : originally came from the factory w/cast iron crankshaft & cast pistons, open chamber oval port heads, hydraulic lifter camshaft, Q-Jet carburetor w/low-rise intake manifold.
In 1972 w/8.5:1 compression and dual exhaust = 240 net horsepower & and in 1971 gross hp = 300 hp.

"Gross HP" ratings were used until 1971 = the engines output on an engine stand, w/no fan belt or exhaust manifolds.

"SAE net HP" ratings started being used in 1972 = usually the engines output as installed in a vehicle w/acessories installed, (fan belt) & exhaust systems.

Just like the camshaft is the "brain" of the engine, ....... The torque converter is the "brain" of the drivetrain.
... a stock torque converter has about 1,500 -1,600 RPM stall speed ...
http://www.corvettefever.com/techarticles/153_0312_454_cam_profile_testing/viewall.html
 
#10 ·
I used a hydraulic cam from a 390 HP 427 in my fathers station wagon. Was originally a 325 HP, Qjet with leaking welsh plugs. I don't remember if the 360/396 and 390/427 used the same cams. Too long ago. Pop liked the way the new cam ran. As mentioned, I'd go with the 220ish intake Voodoo.

As a side note, there was a dicussion on Speedtalk recently where the question posed was "Who makes the best "off the shelf" cam?" Mike Jones, aka: Cam King, reply was one of the VooDoos. Mike only grinds custom cams.
 
#11 ·
I used a hydraulic cam from a 390 HP 427 in my fathers station wagon. Was originally a 325 HP, Qjet with leaking welsh plugs. I don't remember if the 360/396 and 390/427 used the same cams. Too long ago. Pop liked the way the new cam ran. As mentioned, I'd go with the 220ish intake Voodoo.

As a side note, there was a dicussion on Speedtalk recently where the question posed was "Who makes the best "off the shelf" cam?" Mike Jones, aka: Cam King, reply was one of the VooDoos. Mike only grinds custom cams.
Yes 350 and 360 hp 396's had the same cam specs as the 385, 390, and 400 hp 427's. Also the LS5 454's.
 
#8 ·
Pull the heads and have a GOOD head porter do a lil bowl work /gasket match them and your intake, do some flash cleanup. I'd have the valves unshrouded and chamber opened up a bit to lower the 10+ compression. If the guides are good put some good flowing performance valves in them. If the guides are bad get some 11/32 liners put in, and run the better flowing/lighter valves in them. The voodoo 60202 and 60203 mentioned above are nice 396 cam's, get the correct springs to match. That and the timing mods ( 2500 stall if it's an auto ) should make it a different car
 
#7 ·
With the engine that mild I wouldnt go to a higher stall torque converter, it makes it feel sluggish at low RPM. Keep the q-jet if you have one. Headers, good exhaust and good distributor curve will help a lot
 
#6 ·
Depending on the model year, the 325 and 350 horse 396 were essentially identical other than camshaft.

May have had minor differences in carb or distributor, but the "real" difference was cam.
 
#9 ·
Depending on the model year, the 325 and 350 horse 396 were essentially identical other than camshaft.

May have had minor differences in carb or distributor, but the "real" difference was cam.
In Ca the 325 hp was equipped with a QJet and a 360 hp had a small holley as well as a different cam.
 
#5 ·
Add headers and performance ignition curve, carb/jet/ adjustment should net you at lest 25hp-30hp. DONT tear that baby Rat apart for a cam change until you complete the above mentioned upgrades.:yes:
 
#4 ·
Intake, carb, and headers/2.5" mandrel bent exhaust and a performance ignition curve will pull more power out of the existing combo. Try of perf rpm with 3310 750 vac sec. Auto or stick car? If auto, a little more converter will help it out of the hole-- 2200-2400rpm stall. Alot to be gained without removing the front cover.


Sent from my Autoguide iPhone app
 
#2 ·
I think a Crane Energizer 272 216 duration @ .050 with .515 lift might get you by without changing anything possibly. I don't know how old your valve springs are so you need to pay attention to that on a cam change. I forget what lift you can have before cutting the valve guide bosses down. If you don't have that done your retainers will come crashing down on them and probably break push rods, rockers and such. The stock 350 hp cam was around 460 lift on intake and 480 on exhaust and your stock 325 is around .398 lift. If it has the Q-JET leave it on there. With the amount of power your wanting to get it will supply the fuel you need.