This must be like a Ford Chevy argument. Both can be made to work. There are more factory electric fan cooled V8's being made now than mechanical clutch fans.
True... Many people will adapt some junkyard parts (remember when "Windstar" fans were so popular?)... Others will but the cheapest electric setup they can find, and still others will still buy the cheapest flex fan they can... Or buy some off-brand at a swap meet, etc...
Yes, GM engineering made sure these stock cooling setups were sufficient, of course that was with maybe 450 HP of the LS6 (what was the net HP?). More power equals more heat, so a stock setup may be fine for a mild build or a stock resto, but even back in the '60s, the bean counters were still predominantly in charge, so the cooling systems were adequate for their intended design...
Of course, IF the stock setups were really so great, then companies like Be-Cool, DeWitts, Griffin, Hayden, Derale, etc, etc, etc wouldn't have much if any aftermarket business...
Of course, it just goes to show the complexity of automobiles in general... Too many factors: timing, mixture, engine size, cylinder wall thickness, water pump, pulley ratios, radiator cores, fan design (4-blade, 5-blade, 6-blade flex, 7 blade, clutch/no-clutch), shroud, crossflow/downflow... Nearly impossible to get an apples to apples comparison...
On my latest project ('66 SS) I am planning a "stock" mechanical fan setup with a stock shroud and a 4-row radiator, but using a "1970" 7 blade fan and the HD Hayden clutch because I feel that's better than a stock 1966 5-blade setup (the 5-blade uses a different mounting pattern, and Hayden does NOT make a HD clutch for that model). But I am still considering adding some supplemental electric fans to help with low-speed cooling...