If you're just a cruiser, why do you want any of it? Those kits are expensive!
I agree, The main reason for the adjustable uppers is IF you want/need to set the pinion angle... This can be important for lowered cars , and maybe drag racers (but not sure how much need for coil spring cars)...
IMO, I'd avoid poly bushings in the upper arms, especially "boxed" or stiff upper arms... Look at the rear suspension, note the different angles of the control arms and try to picture how these move when you hit a bump, and you can see that the rear arms/bushing NEED to flex in order for the rear axle to articulate. Not enough flex in the arms and bushing makes the rear suspension too stiff (those binding arms will act like an additional very stiff spring). Ever notice how difficult it is to get that last arm into position and the last bolt thru the upper arms and frame? You have to get the rearend in just the right position. I once swapped poly bushed stock arms for rubber bushing (just the uppers), and the ride and handling both improved... I am running upper arms with a spherical joint at the frame-side, and new rubber bushing in the axle housing (next time I'll go to spherical there too)...
If the arms and bushings can't deflect, then the stress goes elsewhere... usually into the frame cross-member. Ever notice that the Big Block, hipo 4-speeds, etc use those extra reinforcement braces? Those help transfer some of the stress from the frame cross-member to the lower bolt and the much stronger area of the frame... Maybe frames have a tendency to crack that upper cross-member, so why risk that with stiff upper arms?
For a cruiser, even with some spirited driving, new, quality rubber bushings will work great, along with shocks and maybe a rear swaybar...
Poly bushings and boxed lower arms aren't as bad, because they are roughly parallel, not as much bind...
...I put on a heavier front sway bar, and it handles pretty decent. I have problems with high speed wandering, but that is mostly related to the front suspension...I think...
Mark
Mark, is all your steering linkage fresh and/or tight? Was all the suspension fasteners torqued to spec? Did you change the steering box? How about alignment specs? These cars were designed and built before radial tires, I have heard that revised alignment specs (even when using stock parts) can help with handling...
Another thing to consider, is a "firmer" steering box... Not necessarily a Quick ratio, but rather a larger input T-bar ( but these are usually used only on the quick ratio boxes)...
My Chevelle, I once had a high-speed floaty issue right after updating... Turns out I didn't torque all the bolts. I tightened everything, but I was using those aircraft nylon lock-nuts, so I thought it would be fine... Went back and torqued all the bolts (I think 85+ lb-ft), and a huge difference... Turns out the frame brackets actually deflect and pinch the inner bushing sleeves...
Another change for me was the install of a firm box (AGR) in place of a used GM quick ratio box... Same ratio, but the firmer valving made a HUGE difference in road feel...
HandOverFist said:
Another option since it is just a cruiser is to just replace your bushings with factory rubber, drill your arms for sway bar mounting (there should be locating dimples already there) and don't worry with the boxing. Pick up a used sway bar or the cheapest new you can find.
I have done this... Without the boxing or a sleeve around the bolts the arms will start to collapse, which may cause them to bend and deflect when the swaybar bolts are torqued... Should be okay if you don't go crazy with the bolt torque...
I took my stock lowers, and welded a 3/16" plate along the bottom, but you could also cut some spacers out of pipe, etc...