If I may throw a monkey wrench into the mix...
A lot of people throw around arbitrary numbers for initial and total timing, but it's imperative that the engine combination be taken into consideration when determining those numbers--i.e. not all engines want (or need) 14°-16° initial and 34°-36° total--some will require more or less.
A few examples: The 489 I built for my Suburban (but is currently in service in my dually) has a flat top piston and a 119 c.c. chamber 049 cylinder head. Compression is right at 8.5-1. When the engine was on the dyno, I experimented with total timing, and as it turns out, this engine only wanted 32° of total timing--and it actually made the same power with the total at 30°. Anything more than this cost power everywhere. Of course it did idle better with the higher initial, but more on that in a moment. Note that this engine made peak HP at only 4700 RPM (by design).
My 13-1 306" dyno mule has a large dome piston and angle milled 462 heads with a 58 c.c. chamber. When I had it on the dyno, we started at 32° and went up in 2° increments to see what it wanted for total. We stopped at 42°--not because that was where it made best power, but because that's where the plugs were telling us to stop. It was still picking up significant power each time we added timing. Initial isn't a factor on this engine as the distributor is locked out. This engine made peak HP at 7500 RPM but the valve springs weren't quite up to the task above that. It too will be re-dyno'ed soon and should make peak power at 8000 or slightly above.
My 572" engine that's destined for my dually has a reverse dome piston and (at the time) a 119 c.c. chamber, compression was about 8.6-1. I built it that way intentionally as I wanted it to be able to run on even the worse pump fuel, and it will see a lot of low rpm heavy load which as we all know is where detonation is most likely to occur. My dyno guy set initial timing to 34°, and after a number of pulls he wanted to bump it to 36°. I agreed, but told him "don't be surprised if it loses power"--which is exactly what it did. I had him roll it back to 32° total and it picked up power everywhere--much to his surprise. 😁
Lastly, my 10.5-1 505" dyno mule has a small dome piston with 119 c.c. chamber 990 heads (radically reworked). We started at 32° and wound up stopping at 40°--it may want even more, I'll find out (hopefully) soon when I re-dyno it. We found a ring issue and had to abort the first round of testing.
As far as initial timing, more often makes a dramatic improvement in idle quality and vacuum, but this also makes the engine more sensitive to lower rpm detonation. There are a number of ways to address that problem, but the point is "more is better" doesn't always apply here. (I learned this lesson the hard way on a 406 small block that broke a ring land due to detonation--that could NOT be heard audibly)
Lastly--re: locked out distributors--I've seen instances where a locked out distributor slowed a car down a full .4 in the 60'--yes, you read that right. This was many years ago on a "pure stock" race car with an L72 427, a "stock" (<3000 rpm stall) converter, 400 Turbo and a 4.56 gear. It didn't slow down due to wheel spin, it slowed down because all that low rpm timing absolutely slaughtered low end power at WOT. Unlocking the distributor brought the car's 60' times right back where they were previously.
I have other examples I could share, but lest I ramble....
The take-aways here are: more isn't always better, the old "advance it `till it pings and back it off 2° is bunk, and the dyno is your friend--if you know what to look for.