=
Yes, you are doing pretty much the same thing but being as it is so easy I would put a bit more time on it before leaning on it too hard & vary the speed & loads during this time.Then go hammer it & see what falls off
If the engine was built properly it should be happy.
If not,,, oh well,,,
I think probably one of the worst things you can do is any kind of steady state loaded or unloaded running when the engine is new.
============
=
And again, I ask the same question,, what magically happens at 500 or 1000 miles?
Does the engine become different?
I don't really care what GM says, I don't build engines like GM does.
I use torque plates on every engine I do so the bores are reasonably round from the start.
The finish I use is pretty well what it will be in 500 or 1000 miles from the start due to the stones & technique I use.
And I have dynoed more than a few GM crate performance engines & they certainly did not have 500 miles on them with no ill effects.
What does a circle track engine not being built for hi mileage have to do with anything?
Do I have to use some different magical formula to build these "different" engines??
What about road race ones? What in your opinion should I do different here :sad:
I do quite a few circle track as well as performance street stuff & I certainly don't change much in them except for compression, cam etc. & this has nothing to do with break-in
So again, explain exactly what in your opinion changes on "break-in" with a well built performance engine?
50 or so years ago you needed to "break-in" rings because the bores as well as the rings were nothing like they are today.
As I earlier stated, if the bores are correctly done the rings are damn near broke in on the starter.
And in case you missed it, as I stated, if you have to go 1000 or even 500 miles before the engine is "broken in" there are a number of folks on just this site that are in deep doo-doo that have made this horrible mistake of leaning on a fresh engine before these magical numbers have been reached