Team Chevelle banner
21 - 40 of 67 Posts
Thanks for the sender tip. I was hoping to avoid the massaging to get the aftermarket sender adjusted to the tank. I shouldn't be so lazy. lol and I bit the bullet and paid the $14 shipping for the two cork gaskets. It's annoying, but at least I know they will work with the units.
The massaging involved equates to measuring a rod, cutting it a specific length according to the instructions, and attaching it to the sending unit. I can be pretty lazy at times, and it was simple enough for me to get right the first time.. :)

-Dave
 
Discussion starter · #22 ·
Well Ill be driving it this week and gonna get the fuel level down to close to empty and pull the tank and check everything out. I have another TANKSINC tank sitting here for a ls1 swapped 72 im gonna compare the baffles and see what the difference is.
 
Discussion starter · #23 ·
So no luck. I've contacted aeromotive and tanks inc and they both told me their product sucks. So im exploring other options. I'm thinking about running a surge tank inside the trunk and that feeding an a1000 pump. I don't know what else to do. It sucks when you cant even launch your car or take an exit/entrance loop ramp at a decent speed.
Also I'm about to turn this into a heat case since I just pulled the tank and its leaking in some spots around the seams. Seems pretty pitiful that its a brand new $700+ tank and it doesn't work and it leaks.
 

Attachments

Can't believe I missed this Thread after my issues in thread below, from there it appears blokes running the 255LPH pump are fine, but I have had no issues on street like yourself, maybe I've just been behaving myself a little more.

http://www.chevelles.com/forums/89-efi/949874-efi-tank-limitations.html

My solution, hopefully get majority plumbed & connected this weekend.

 
Supposedly Tank's Inc makes Aeromotive's tanks, only the pumps differ.
I emailed Tank's inc this week and they confirmed that the baffling on their retrofit tanks is being revised to address this issue. Kinda sucks if you already have one though.
 
HandOverFist said:
Check with rel3rd (Bob)...he has the same and runs the piss out of his car everytime it's out of the garage. If there were a problem with it we would hear about it for sure.
rel3rd said:
You got that right, LOL.
Down to 1/8th tank by accident once so far, and no issues whatsoever with WOT...:thumbsup:
Weird....that was reply from back in JUNE...and just to update 2/16/17

I took mine out yesterday for a parts run and some BFG abuse...1/8th tank, not by accident, but by my laziness to not stop...

Ran 100%...No nosing over, no leaning out, no pulling/hp loss that I could feel/hear... :confused:
 
Discussion starter · #32 ·
after exchanging emails with one of the Aeromotive tech advisors I received a phone call today from him explaining that since my tank is leaking they are going to replace it under warranty and they are sending the new style sump that Tanks Inc hasn't released yet. He doesnt know if it will cure all the issues of fuel starvation but he said its worth a shot with the new style sump.
 
From Aeromotive's Website:
340 Stealth Tank Application Specs:
Fuel Injected Engines (gasoline):
Up to 850 HP – naturally aspirated.
Up to 700 HP – forced air induction.
Carbureted Engines (gasoline):
Up to 1000 HP – naturally aspirated.
Up to 800 HP – forced air induction
Also from Aeromotive's Website:
Stealth Fuel Tanks are not engineered for competition drag racing or road racing applications.
That is the two main reasons someone would want all that power.
 
I've been passively watching this thread. I purchased a scratch and dent special from Tanks Inc for my 64 Chevelle, received it Saturday. I've tried to get pics of the sump, it's a bucket spot welded to the bottom of the tank. Hopefully this is the new design?



 
How does the fuel enter the sump? Does not seem to be any holes or slots to allow it to fill.
 
21 - 40 of 67 Posts