Team Chevelle banner
1 - 20 of 34 Posts

soccerguy045

· Registered
Joined
·
183 Posts
Discussion starter · #1 ·
My machinist wants me to get my -781s flowed before we start engine work and figure out what head work to do on them. That's fine with me. My machinist, although he doesn't like big blocks, likes the -781 heads, but insists on flowing first because they might not even need the 2.19/1.72 (or is it 1.88) valves, for example.

Anyone ever not gone with bigger valves in their open chamber heads? Just wondering what scenarios would call for not using them.

Do the '781s have typical areas or techniques that people like to do to them when porting?

I guess I'll find out either way soon, thanks guys.
 
Save
who in Tulsa are you using to assemble?
 
Save
Discussion starter · #3 ·
I will assemble in engine myself but the machine work will be done by Tom Lucito in Tulsa and the head porting will be done by Aaron Kelley, can't remember where from but somewhere close to Tulsa.
 
Save
Taylor,
We have a set of heads in the shop #215 castings with 2.19/1.88 one peice stainless steel valves, along with all the hardware.

They're cut for viton seals and have the seals installed, along with a set of springs that will work with a mild hydraulic cam.

They already have seats installed, and a 3 angle valve job.

We're asking $1350, and they're a superior head to the 781 in reguards to a street/strip performance application, as the #215 doesnt require as large of a dome to make 10 or 11:1 compression depending on what you want.

A semi-closed chamber is less suspectable to detonation.

Our procedure of grinding the seats is more accurate then the Serdi machines common to many machine shops anymore. Serdis are a production line machine and should not be used with a performance valve job without cleanup work with the stone.

My suggestion, I personally think that you're plans to have the heads ported and flow tested is money that could be spent elsewhere more effectively.

If you plan to port the heads, my suggestion is to only have the bowls, and guide bosses worked.

No personal offense meant if any is taken by this statement, but if this is your first performance motor, Do not assemble it yourself without the guiding hand of a professional engine builder.
 
Discussion starter · #5 ·
Thanks for the advice. Since I already have the -781s I think I would just like to use what I have, but thanks. My machinist builds performance/race engines and is pretty well known in my parts. We've done an engine or two with him before and he knows his stuff.

I've rebuilt a motor before, and although it wasn't really performance there were a lot of new internals like pistons and such so we've got checking clearances and stuff down so I think we'll be okay there.

No offense taken, I just appreciate all advice. Thanks.
 
Save
Originally posted by Motor Martyr:



Our procedure of grinding the seats is more accurate then the Serdi machines common to many machine shops anymore. Serdis are a production line machine and should not be used with a performance valve job without cleanup work with the stone.
What`s the hot set up now?
This is news to me, but I`m willing to learn, can you elaborate?
 
Save
The large valves 2.19/1.88 is easy horsepower,don't let them talk you into NOT doing it. What rpm range will your motor operate? 6500 or less they don't need to be flowed, they'll flow enough in stock form,clean up the short turn radius. I had the larger valves installed,.020 taken off and combustion chambers cc'ed.
 
Originally posted by BigRed-L72:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Motor Martyr:



Our procedure of grinding the seats is more accurate then the Serdi machines common to many machine shops anymore. Serdis are a production line machine and should not be used with a performance valve job without cleanup work with the stone.
What`s the hot set up now?
This is news to me, but I`m willing to learn, can you elaborate?
</font>[/QUOTE]Actually, its backwards from what many think, the old "outdated" seat grinding stones of yesterday are extremely acurrate.

At my work, we fix alot of the jobs that serdi production machines do.
 
Taylor, my buddy at work has a +.030 454 that made 475 hp & 510 ft.lbs of torque with small valve 781 heads. The heads only had a good valve job and some minor bowl work. Its a pump gas motor with a small Comp Cams hydraulic roller, Air-Gap rpm and 750 HP.

Performance wise there is no downside to adding the larger valves, its all a question of your ultimate goal.

Jeff
65 Chevelle SS
Best ET 12.57
Best MPH 114

Brian, how much seat runout are you seeing on the Serdi seat? Just curious, I used to work for Kwik-Way.
 
Save
It's known that small valve heads will flow very well after a good bowl rework and some port dingle-berry, casting flash cleanup.

Just adding bigger valves, but not doing the same to the modified heads as the reworked stock valve heads WON'T make them flow any better!

It's only after you do everything to the newly installed big valved heads do they start to flow like gang-busters..

What I am trying to say is that for a good mild street motor, cleaned up stock heads ARE the best bang for the buck, flow-wise!! It's only when you need to buy new valves should you consider really modifying your heads as well as creating a more powerful overall motor combination.. Then the addition of bigger valves pays off hansomely, imho..

Afterthought, please consider a set of Merlin ovals and valve train parts from Competition Products before you jump into reworked heads.. I did..

http://www.competitionproducts.com/2004CompProducts.pdf

pdq67

Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
 
Pdq, you are right on the money. Unless the machine shop owner takes a personal liking to you, reworking old heads is a black hole. I have $3800 Canadian into a set of serious 781's. Why bother? The SOB saw me comming, and after the dyno damage was repaired, that's what they stand me. I repeat, why bother? Yeah, I got one of the most smokin' set of 781's on the board. So bloody what. Coulda had some nice aluminum for that kind of raha.
 
Save
Deleted, double post
Image


Must have used one of the damn Serdi's
 
Originally posted by Motor Martyr:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by BigRed-L72:
</font><blockquote>quote:</font><hr />Originally posted by Motor Martyr:



Our procedure of grinding the seats is more accurate then the Serdi machines common to many machine shops anymore. Serdis are a production line machine and should not be used with a performance valve job without cleanup work with the stone.
What`s the hot set up now?
This is news to me, but I`m willing to learn, can you elaborate?
</font>[/QUOTE]Actually, its backwards from what many think, the old "outdated" seat grinding stones of yesterday are extremely acurrate.

At my work, we fix alot of the jobs that serdi production machines do.
</font>[/QUOTE]Brian,
Offense taken :(
That is the first bit of complete misinformation I have seen you post.

I happen to do everything from street heads to $8000 18 degree heads & I do them on a Serdi & it along with a couple of other machines are by far the most accurate & repeatable machines used in the industry if used properly.
Every cup shop I know of & almost every top race engine & head shop in the country FINISH the seats with a Serdi, Sunnen or Newen machine with some of the best & most repeatable results in the industry.
To say a Serdi is just a "production machine" is a complete misstatement of the facts.

I am not saying you cannot do an excellent job with stones but to say you can do it better is just not factual unless you are not competent in using a Serdi.
I have been doing "valve jobs" for well over 40 years & trust me when I tell you I know how to do it with stones but having a Serdi for the last 12+ years has given me a slightly different outlook on the accuracy of valve seats & seat to seat consistency.

Every seat we do be it performance or not is vacuumed checked with no spring & must pull a complete dead vacuum or it is not considered finished & every seat is within a couple of thou of the same distance from the deck & on the performance stuff the spring seat is then corrected from the stem of the valve.

In a production environment this is not done as, one they don't give a damn of it's right & two they don't or are not allowed the time to do it right.
This does not make the machine bad, only the person using the machine ;)
 
I've seen plenty of valve jobs come through the shop that we've had to fix that were done on Serdi and Other Production machines where the seats were out of concentricity by as much as .010"

My seats when finished are within .001" concentricity When done with stones.

I feel that the Serdi production machines have No place doing a performance valve job.

Even when the seat is out by .002-.003" sometimes it will vacuum check fine, depending on how much clearance is in the guide.

we vacuum check ours and on the higher end peices we use a neat little tool that measures how far out the valve seat is, or how good it is. It sits on a pilot and has a test indicator built in.

You are right that it comes down to the operator, but considering this "misinformation" is far from the truth.
Consider that the majority of readers to this post will be considering a set of aftermarket Cylinder heads at one time or another. The aftermarket uses the "Serdi" buzzword and since they will associate the Serdi with quality work....they assume the valve jobs produced on production lines are good work.
 
Attsa bit condenscending ASSUMING most readers here ASSUME anything.
 
Save
Brian,
I stand by what I said.

The Serdi is not a "production machine"

It can be used as a production machine or it can be used as a performance machine just as a boring mill or surfacer or almost any other piece of equipment in a shop.

Again it comes down the person using the equipment & the intended usage.

CNC machining centers are used in both production & performance environments but will hold tolerances in the tenths in the right hands.
This does not make them a production only machine.

The only people I have ever met in this trade that tell people that a Serdi, Newen, Sunnen etc. head machining center is not the best way to machine seats are shops that either do not have one or don't know how to use one.

I am aware you can pull a vacuum with enough clearance in the guide but in some applications I use less than a thou on the intake & I will guarantee you these will not pull a vacuum unless they are pretty concentric

I also have trick little tools that measures runout & I use straight solid live carbide pilots that are in increments of .0002" that have two conditions,, they are dead straight or they are in two pieces.
This is not the case with tool steel Sioux stone pilots or most stone pilots as I have had to replace many over the years that were not concentric.

There is only one stone system I know of that can do what the machines can in regards to radius stuff & that is the Hall Toledo with the radius dressing option & it takes a very good operator to use it properly just as it takes a good operator to use any piece of equipment.

Before you make blanket statements about something like this take the time to attend something like the PRI show & try using this machine.
They are there, set up & running & waiting for you to try.

Just take a look at who is using them in the performance industry.

I have a little more experience in regards to machine work than you & as I stated I do know how to use stones & I can tell you from this experience that stones are an archaic way to do valve seats.

Don't take my word for it, call or walk into any top performance engine shop & see what is there.

As I already stated I know how to use stones, still have stones & still use stones on things like flat head fords about once every 4 or 5 years when I get talked into doing one :D

Again I am not saying you cannot use stones & do a first class job, what I am saying is the machines, in the right hands will do it better, faster & more repeatable in almost every instance.

I freshen some pretty expensive heads that were done by some of the top head shops in the country like WeldTech, HRD, M2 etc & if you call any one of these shops & tell them you are any where near their heads with stones for finishing seats I doubt you will appreciate the response.

Not to be redundant but,,, it all comes down to who is using the machine.

There are some that can ruin an anvil with a rubber mallet,, & there are a lot of Serdi's in production shops that do not take the time to do their work properly just as their are shop with stones that do horrible work

Again, do not fault the equipment because an idiot is running it.
 
Brian, After a little run time most guides wear and therefore would present some error for your checking if the measuring tool depended on the guide to locate it. According to a friend who did a lot of Motorcycle Racing engines he told me a Serdi was the only way he could get a dead nuts on valve job on their four valve heads. There was another plus to the machined seats vs. the ground seats in that the machined seats "broke" the sharp edges between angles increasing the flow considerably. He also said that any four valve head that had many miles on them would have "lots" of valve guide wear and the Serdi used a special self centering devise which didn't need for the guide to be perfectly aligned to get an accurate valve job. I think like Wolfy said it's more in the operators lack of care than the machine. My son had a set of G.M. cast iron open chamber heads that had been done on a Sunnen seat machine and then a very good friend of mine freshened with stones and the motor never ran as good after the redo with the stones but this guy is a very good friend so i would never say anything to him as his friendship is far more important to me than any set of heads.
 
You hit the nail on the head Mike, the only way to have an accurate job on a Serdi is with a Carbide pilot.

As i've stated before, My advice relates to the typical enthusiast, going to the typical Machine shop.

The typical shops are not spending $150+ for Carbide pilots, basically because they dont do performance work All the time.

Serdi is just another Buzzword for the performance industry to sell products, just like "CNC" or "Billet". Just because it's done on one of these machines does Not make it Better.

Where we will not agree, is i do not feel that they are better, and stones in the right hands are deadly accurate.

So let me explain my original statement in terms of the typical shop. First, I doubt that Taylor is having his heads done by Steve Schmidt, Sonny Leonard, Reher Morrison or Any of the top names in performance engines.....instead he's going to a local shop.
I dont know this particular shop, but as i've found with the work that we fix with stones, the typical shop is using Tool steel pilots, which will have a runout when cut.

We use brand new pilots on the performance jobs, such as Porsche heads.
 
CNC isn't a buzzword to those that use them and see them in use. I have been privy to many CNC machining projects that change work that required 10+ machines to 1 or 2 machines to do the same part. To go from a process that requires 10+ fixtures to 1 or 2 in itself is a great improvement along with the precision of these machines vs. manual operations on complex parts. Try machining 100 of the same complex parts in a brideport compared to a 5 axis CNC machining center.
 
Save
1 - 20 of 34 Posts
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.