... almost every car is an SS anymore. It's kind of a shame really; you get the feelings if your car doesn't have SS tags it's not worth having. Its kind of sad...
Not at all... IMO, just about the only people that feel a car without SS tags is not worth owning, would be the people that are looking to sell/flip a car for profit...
Ask any "clone" owner if they added the SS emblems to make their car worth more, and I doubt you will find very many that did so...
I have built clones in the past, because that was what I had to start with and that I could afford... I like the look of the SS, the "sportiness" that comes with the blacked out grill and the special hoods... Of course, I also look to the buckets/console that weren't SS-specific or even SS-standard... But to me, a floor-shift is sporty (even if its a powerglide)...
For me, the oNLY place I see a "true" SS as being better, is if its original, or fully restored (to original)... Then maybe its something special...
Once you modify the car, or its original engine (etc) is gone, what does it matter if its "real" or a clone? Heritage is nice, but big deal if its missing stuff or modified...
Personally, if I was looking at non-original cars (missing engines, etc), I'd rather have a Malibu/clone with bucket seats/console than a "real" SS with a bench, especially a column-shifted auto...
Now, I do cringe at "incorrect" clones, ones that are obvious it was an attempt at a "clone", yet emblems in the wrong place, or incorrect trim...
I have my '70 Malibu with the SS hood, and I am pulling all the "Malibu" trim off the car... I am NOT adding SS emblems and I am not putting on stock wheels, but I did black the grll out and add the clear parking lights... I am debating if I want to add the wheel opening mouldings, and I wish I could find a "blank" rear bumper pad...
I think it just looks more sporty and muscular that way...
My '66 SS, looks like it will be modified quite a bit...
Its all personal preference...