Team Chevelle banner
Status
Not open for further replies.
101 - 120 of 282 Posts
Ya, I'm a late comer and did read the whole thread. Very good job Scott.
I lost 3 lobes at the end of last summer and am pissed over it. Gradual wear, nothing in the oil or the filter when I cut it apart.

Believe it or not, in Canada we don't see too many places that sell the same oils that are available in the US. So much for that free trade crap.

IE
Never seen in the great white North
CHEVRON DELO 400
PENNZOIL GT 25W-50

I'd like to get 30WT SHELL ROTELLA and can't find it here. All I see is the multi viscosity.
Image
 
I'd like to get 30WT SHELL ROTELLA and can't find it here. All I see is the multi viscosity.
Image
got a truck stop near ya?

they'll have it;)
 
Discussion starter · #103 · (Edited)
Dan,good idea to chk out the local diesel truck stop of big rig service center,they should have some CI rated 15w-40 around or maybe even some singel grade 30wt.

Copo,GOT A NAME?,if its not a problem shipping over the boarder you can order the valvoline or pennzoil from summit jegs or lubriplate oil from the lubriplate site or the chevron delo from the intranet too.

But in the meantime untill you can get oil with good zddp lvl's you can use the over counter oils sold today in most stores that have the lower zddp lvls and then use 1 pint of GM EOS or Crane's superlube breakin conentrate in 5-6QT OIL CHANGE to boost the zddp to safe lvl's when running a flat tappet perf cam for proper protection.

Scott
 
Save
Just got this from my contact at GM from the Fluids and Lube Engineer at GM, also an Engine Oil Group Leader. He is a leading expert in his field.

The direct answer to your friends question is that our gasoline engine oils contain just under 800 ppm phosphorus. 800 ppm is the limit for ILSAC GF-4/ API SM oils.

Unfortunately your friend is being sucked in by snake oil salesman or maybe he even is one. I have attached a copy of one of the articles I have written on this subject. I also have written SAE papers and give seminars at local car clubs debunking the "they took all the anti-wear out" myth. I must caution you that if your friend is a true believer - all the logic and data in the world will not persuade him.


Engine Oil Mythology

GMPT – Fuels & Lubes

Myths are ill-founded beliefs held uncritically by interested groups. Over the years there has been an overabundance of engine oil myths. One was that the only good oils were oils made from “Pure Pennsylvania Crude Oil.” This one got started before the Second World War when engine oil was crude oil with very minimal refining, and crude oil from Pennsylvania made better engine oil than Texas or California crude. With modern refining, almost any crude can be made into good engine oil.

The next myth was that “modern” detergent engine oils were bad for older engines. This one got started after the Second World War, when the government no longer needed all the detergent oil for the war effort, and it hit the market as Heavy-Duty oil. These new detergent oils gave the pre-war cars, which had been driven way past their normal life and were full of sludge and deposits, a massive enema. In some cases bad things happened such as increased oil consumption – the piston rings were completely worn out and the massive piston deposits were the only thing standing between merely high and horrendous oil consumption. If detergent oils had been available to the public during the war, this myth never would have started.

Amazingly there are still a few people today, 60 years later, who believe that they need to use non-detergent oil in their older cars. Apparently it takes about 75 years for an oil myth to die.

Then there is the myth that new engines will not break-in on synthetic oils. Apparently there was an aircraft engine manufacturer who once put out a bulletin to this effect. Clearly the thousands and thousands of cars filled with Mobil 1 as factory-fill, which have broke-in quite well, should have put this one to rest. However this one is only 40 years old, so it has another 35 years to live.

All of these myths have a common theme; newer oils are bad. And this brings us to the latest myth – new “Starburst”/ API SM engine oils are bad for older cars because the amount of anti-wear additive in them has been reduced. This one has gotten big play in the antique and collector car press lately. The anti-wear additive being discussed is zinc dithiophosphate (ZDP).

Before debunking this myth we need to look at the history of ZDP usage in engine oil.

ZDP has been used for over 60 years as an additive in engine oils to provide wear protection and oxidation stability. Unfortunately, ZDP contains phosphorus, and phosphorus is a poison for automotive catalysts. For this reason ZDP levels have been reduced by about 35% over the last 10-15 years down to a maximum of 0.08% for “Starburst”/API SM oils.

Zinc dithiophosphate was first added to engine oil to control copper/lead bearing corrosion. Starting in 1942, a Chevrolet Stovebolt engine with aftermarket copper/lead insert bearing connecting rods was the standard oil test . The insert bearings were weighed before and after test for weight loss due to corrosion. The phosphorus levels of oils that passed the test were in the 0.03% range.

In the mid 1950s Oldsmobile got in a horsepower war with its Rocket engine against the Chrysler Hemi. Both companies went to high-lift camshafts and both got into camshaft scuffing and wear problems very fast. There were three solutions. Better camshaft and lifter metallurgy, phosphating the camshaft, and increasing the phosphorus level from ZDP up to the 0.08% range. Another outcome was a battery of industry wide “Sequence” oil tests. Two of theses tests were valve-train scuffing/wear tests.

Knowing that this higher level of ZDP was good for flat-tappet valve-train scuffing and wear, some oil companies dumped even more in thinking that they were offering the customer even more protection. However it was soon learned that while going above something like 0.14% phosphorus might decrease break-in scuffing, it increased longer term wear. At about 0.20% phosphorus the ZDP started attacking the grain boundaries in the iron, resulting in camshaft spalling.

Later in the 1970s, the ZDP level was pushed up to the 0.10% phosphorus range as it was a cheap and effective antioxidant, and increased antioxidancy was needed to protect the oil in Cadillacs pulling Airstream trailers from thickening to the point of not pumping. Recently, the need for this higher level of ZDP for protecting the oil from thickening has been greatly reduced with the introduction of more modern ashless antioxidants that contain no phosphorus.

Enough history, now getting back to the myth that “Starburst/API SM oils are no good for older cars. The argument put forth by the myth believers is that while these oils work perfectly well in modern gasoline engines equipped with roller camshafts, they will cause catastrophic wear in older engines equipped with flat-tappet camshafts.


The “Starburst”/API SM oil standards were developed by a group of OEM, oil additive company, and oil company experts. When developing any new engine oil standard the issue of “backward compatibility” always comes up, and indeed the group of experts spent a lot of time researching this issue. Various oil and additive companies ran “no harm” tests on older cars with the new oils. No problems were uncovered.

The new specification contains two valve-train wear tests. One is the Sequence IVA Test which tests for camshaft scuffing and wear using a 2.4L Nissan single overhead camshaft engine with slider finger followers. The wear limits were tightened from the previous oil specification which contained a phosphorus limit of 0.10%. The second is the Sequence IIIG Test which evaluates cam and lifter wear. A current production GM Powertrain 3.8L engine with the valve train replaced with a flat tappet system similar to those used in the 1980s is used. The only reason that this test engine uses this older valve train design is to insure that older engines are protected. All “Starburst”/API SM oil formulations must pass these two tests.

In addition to the protection offered by these two valvetrain wear tests and the new testing which was conducted on the formulations containing lower levels of ZDP, a review of the knowledge gained over the years in developing previous categories also indicates that no problem should be expected. The new “Starburst”/API SM oils contain about the same percentage of ZDP as the oils that solved the camshaft scuffing and wear issues back in the 1950s. They do contain less ZDP than the oils that solved the oil thickening issues in the 1960s, but that is because they now contain high levels of ashless antioxidants that were not commercially available in the 1960s.

The oil’s ZDP level is only one factor in determining the life of an older camshaft or a new aftermarket camshaft. Most of the anecdotal reports of camshaft failures attributed to the newer oils appear to be with aftermarket camshafts. Breaking in extremely aggressive aftermarket camshafts has always been problem. The legendary Smokey Yunick wrote that his solution to the problem was to buy multiple camshafts and simply try breaking them in until he found one that survived break-in without scuffing.


Despite the pains taken in developing special flat tappet camshaft wear tests that these new oils must pass and the fact that the ZDP level of these new oils is comparable to the level found necessary to protect flat tappet camshafts in the past, there will still be those who want to believe the myth that “new oils will wear out older engines.” Like other myths before it, history teaches us that it will take about 75 years for this one to die also.


February 13, 2007
 
the canadian tire brand diesel oil is good stuff, made by shell or esso has the older rating on it. i have found the pennzoil 25-50 stuff too, locally and when i was in calgary they had it at auto value. even found some rotella, old stock with more zddp in lethbridge, bought a case:thumbsup:
 
When I put in the new cam last year I did everything by the Scott Wheaton book. This year I had my block rebuilt and put in the same cam with lifters in the right place. After initial run I put in Valvoline Premium 10w-40 but now I think that was a mistake. Should I just change the oil and filter again and use the easily accessible and less expensive Delo 400? The GM EOS is $23.00 at my local dealer!
 
Save
Only thing you might add is that if the valve train is using stiff ( solid lifter) springs, it's a good idea to remove the inner spring, if there is one furnished, during the 30 minute break-in run, keeping the rpm's low of course. I have also read from Smokey Yunick's books that the "no-load" rpm should be between 1800-2000 instead of 2200-2500....this minimzes metal to metal contact and allows oil pressure to keep surfaces "away" from each other...also minimizes suspended metallic particulates in the oil.
 
I have been massaging the lobes with the red comp stuff first then applying a good thick moly paste over the top of that. When you crank the engine it mixes into a nice wet paste. I find when you turn over cam and lifters with only moly paste its very dry in one revolution...
 
Discussion starter · #116 ·
James doing that will thicken the thin comp red lube a bit but it also thins the grey moly past so that it will not stick as well or long to cam lobes and lifters which is esp an issue if the motor is not going to be fired up right after new cam install & will be sitting for a while prior to fireup .

I dont rec doing it that way becausee the red comp lube doesnt stick as well as the grey moly cam lube does and i feel the grey moly paste like crane sells in a much better prodcut then comps thin red cam lube,junk IMHO.

Its kinda like putting fresh paint on a house where the exisiting paint isnt adheadering very well so the new layer of paint only adhears as well as the base its going on which would be in that case old flaking paint ,get the idea?

The thinner red comp cam/lifter lube has a rep for not staying on the cam/lifters too long after its applied. But the grey moly cam lube that crane sells will stay much longer when applied to clean/dry fresh cam lobes/lifter faces.

Scott
 
Save
Has any one checked the general aviation oils like aeroshell? I believe the lycoming and continental aircraft engines use flat-tappet lifters and I wouldn't think a change in oil "formulas" would be allowed that would compromise safety in the aviation field?? I brought this up in the performance forum area but no one responded...maybe this has been discussed before? Thanks!
 
Discussion starter · #118 ·
Yes we kinda bounced the Aviation oil thing arround early on in the oil subject. But we were looking for convetional oil that a easy to obtain and aviation oil is not easy to obtain by the avg Joe that want's to pick up oil close by their house.

We found some easily obtainable conventional oils with decent zddp lvl's along with oil additives with hi zddp lvl's for cam breakin,ongoing cam protection post breakin,or for use with oils that have known low zddp lvls less then 1200-1400ppm Zn & P.

So we are good for the time being when it comes to conventional oil that can properly protect a flat tappet cam.

If you work with the aviation oil you should contact the mfg to ask what the zddp lvl is in the grades avail to you. You should also ask them if aviation oil is ok to use in our 30-40 yr old muscle car motors and report the oil mfg/grade & what zddp lvl is for each grade back to us here in t/chevelle for those like you that have availablity to aviation oil.

It would be interesting to see if the mfg of aviation oil would rec it for our older flat tappet cam'd motors along with the zddp lvl for each of the available grades.

So get cracking /we want to know !!!!!! (LOL!!!!)

Scott
 
Save
Discussion starter · #119 ·
LOOKS LIKE ANOTHER GOOD OIL CHOICE FOR FLAT TAPPET CAM PROTECTION PER A FELLOW T/C'R

SEE BELOW FOR DETAILS

SCOTT
================================================================

Scott i called a very honest oil teck at kendall oil today and asked the levels for zd& p and he told me that it was 1600 parts per million and that he recomends this oil to use in falt tappet cam engines for break in and post break in.I have a healthy fresh new built 383 stroker with 470 horse and it was broke in on this oil with great results no drama at all.Also he said that kendall is working on a new 20- 50 oil to be used in older flat tappet cam engines that should be ready to the public in the next year.Also mentioned was the detergent levels in the 15- 40 super d3 kendall and his reply was that the levels are not a threat or a problem on any level as to possible stripping off the good stuff from the cam nor had he heard of this being a problem ever as far he was concerned.The number i called to ask kendall is here for you in case you find this of interest i thought you might so it is 1- 800- 368- 1267 toll free.Scott if this is of some help to all members please post away at will and thank you for all that info you researched for the many at team chevelle.

Alann
 
Save
Discussion starter · #120 · (Edited)
Here is some info/testimony from Gary/GOFAST (an experieced engine builder by trade that often helps us out here in t/chevelle) about some oil he had been using for his flat tappet applications that he thought would be good to pass along to all of us here in t/chrevelle so here it is.

The BP oil Gary is reffering too is Brad Penn.

Scott
==================================================================

I have some recent "limited" (5 units) flat-tappet cam break-in results using BP 30W "Break-In" oil. For flat-tappet cams ONLY!

Truly excellent results so far. Not certain if you're familiar with it already, but it is designed strictly with the flat-tappet cams!

If you like you can "run with it on the forum". Haven't been up there too much recently, am literally "back-logged" with builds. Have had to turn some work away! Don't enjoy doing that!

The oil is somewhat expensive but well worth the investment!

Have a "safe" "4th" today!

Thanks, Gary
 
Save
101 - 120 of 282 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.