Team Chevelle banner
21 - 36 of 36 Posts
Ed,my heads are totally stock..no porting,2.06/1.72 valves,and stock stamped rockers.
Best MPH was 103.9 and thats with no tuning.Out of the box 750 vacuum secondary Holley (other than the 2nd from lightest secondary spring) and a used $50 Accel HEI
 
Discussion starter · #22 ·
I know it's comparing apples to oranges, but what kind of power are you putting out of that 454? Do you think mid to upper 12s is a realistic goal with some head work and possibly changing out the vavletrain(i.e. roller cam and roller rockers)?

I'm running a 3.31 posi, but hell, for you to break into the 12s with 2.56s, you did something right...lol
 
Save
Ed,best guess using the typical formulas is about 440-450 HP at the crank..my car weighs about 4000 lbs.On a dyno,a duplicate of my motor with 2.19/1.88 valves made 490 HP/525 ft/lbs torque
Roller rockers aren't worth anything ET wise,but the proper cam will get you there.A solid cam in the 240-245ish duration @ .050 along with big valves is what it would take IMHO
Mid-high 12's with an M20/3.31's might be possible,but realistically,low 13's would probably be where its at,and you will need sticky tires too,especially with a 4 speed
The 12.99 was a best in absolute perfect condtions in regards to traction/weather.
Car was usually good for a 13.20-13.30 average with some wheelspin.
FYI,my username is confusing in regards to my current ride...the black cherry 70 is a TH400 car.
 
Discussion starter · #24 ·
Everyone keeps telling me to ditch the carb too (Performer 750), I gotta say it's been a good carb for me thus far, mind you, the car gets driven almost daily during the warmer months.
 
Save
Discussion starter · #25 ·
Image


Gotcha mr auto :D

BTW, what part of CT are you in?
Is that pic in your profile from Musclepalooza? I know that's LVD.
 
Save
Discussion starter · #27 ·
not too far from me...
 
Save
Discussion starter · #29 ·
Do you know where Rhinebeck, NY is? Next village north.
I'm about 45 min south of LVD
 
Save
I just wanted to add that it`s my understanding that the bigger valves will not work with the stock style piston. Since the closed oval port motors used small valves, the pistons don`t have the reliefs for the big valves or high lift cams.

Let me say that I do not know this from experience and was told this by 2 machine shops when I was building a 396 years ago. I ended up just selling the motor due to lack of funds. I`m sure someone here can tell you one way or another if there will be clearance issues.
 
Anthony,they where 290 castings with 2.19/1.84 valves and mild porting.
Its fellow TCer "cmt454"

...FYI,stock 396 325 HP motor (small dome) with #063 heads and big valves..with the 2nd design L88 cam..no piston/valve issues.
...needed 4.88's :D
 
Chris is correct, 290 castings with some bowl blending and some ushrouding of the valves. Nothing real involved. Peak torque was 531ft.lbs@3900 rpms. I am changing my entire combo. Brian recommended a new solid cam for me, which I have. Its a Comp XE 273/279, 236/242@.050 .570in and .580 ex. for the lift. Its ground on a 107 LSA and 107 ICL. I now have an 8" BTE 4000 stall converter and 4.10 rear gears. It should be interesting at the track next year :D
 
Save
Pvt. Cowboy..I am just getting it all together in the car now..probably wont get it to the track until mid '05 or so. It should be interesting. Running a 3.31 so I am not expecting any earth shattering times.

Looks like the labor was around $1000.
 
Thanks Cris. I thought your motor would be perfect for me 70 but I think I`ll upgrade to bigger valves and do a little bowl work to the heads. Also, thanks for the valve clearance tip. I was tols by the 2 machine shops around here that it would be a problem but obviously they were wrong since people are doing it without problems.
 
Discussion starter · #36 ·
Sorry guys, I miscalculated CR on my engine after going back and re-running the numbers using the specs provided for the piston, I came up with 10.01:1, which is exactly what the guys at Summitt said as well. I kept thinking 9.5:1 seemed awfully low for a stock type replacement domed piston when the orig. CR from factory was 10.25:1. Anyway, sorry for the confusion, this has also helped me a little as far as what direction I want to go for added performance...

First though, I would like to see numbers on the Dyno and the 1320' before I make any modifications...

Thanks for all the input too...
 
Save
21 - 36 of 36 Posts
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.