Joined
·
926 Posts
Anyone know much about comp stuff?
I've found myself in a strange situation here and not sure what I should do or expect.
The quick rundown is like this:
About 5 years ago I was injured on the job (fell and damaged vertebrae/discs in lower back pretty badly).
I properly documented it with a "incident report" through the company's HR dept, complete with witnesses and was treated @ the hospital.
Fast forward to about 2 years ago:
Been having continued issues with my back since the original injury, saw a specialist and was advised that I needed surgery.
Received the surgery and was "mostly better" for a few months, but slowly returned to being in constant/non-stop pain.
Recent MRI showed ruptured discs are about as bad (again) now as they were before the surgery. Time for another surgery probably.
Things at work have been slow all winter and since I'd been there for almost 5 years I'd worked myself into a good position where light duty work was my assigned duty. This was good for me as I likely couldn't have done the more heavy duty stuff normally associated with our trade with my back being bad like it has.
Well things haven't gotten any better for the company and I was recently told that there was no more light duty stuff available for me, so I agreed to take a lay-off.
Since I'm basically "on the gimp" here I don't know if I can cut it signing on with another contractor where I'd likely have to start off back out in the field doing regular heavy duty work, so I 'm thinking about hitting the comp insurance co again here as I'm basically unable to work due to the continuing decline of my health/abilities from this injury.
They have been pretty good to deal with really so far, and agreed to pay for the surgery and all associated costs before, even though it was over 2 years from the date of the original injury date.
I just kind of wonder what they are going to say now since I've been laid off?
Will they try to say "well we aren't liable for your lack of ability to work because you didn't have a job to go back to even if you were able". ?
I don't know...
Just wonder if there's anything in particular that I want to avoid saying? (Not trying to be deceptive or lie about anything, just wondering how to handle it, as I know their job is to try getting out of paying out on claims).
I've never before asked them for any type pf monetary compensation other than taking care of the medical costs.
They did however at one time a couple years back order me to have a "physical impairment evaluation" done, where they had a Dr evaluate how much of a percentage I was premanently physically disabled due to the injury. They then paid out a lump sum amount check based on the percentage of impairment the Dr said I'd sustained.
I really wish I'd known that was what was going on at teh time, as I took a ton of pain killers prior to doing the (4-hour) physical evaluation tasks.
Had I known all that prior I'd have elected to do the physical evaluation's tasks without taking the pain meds to make it more of an "apples to apples" comparison with my abilities in the work place.
I certainly wouldn't take pain meds like that at work, so their evaluation of my physical abilities from that evaluation were really nothing like what I could bring to the table in a work type environment...
I wonder if I could get them to re do that evaluation w/o the meds? I doubt it.
So anyway, that's about where I'm at here with this, anyone have any similar experiences or advise to offer?
Thanks
I've found myself in a strange situation here and not sure what I should do or expect.
The quick rundown is like this:
About 5 years ago I was injured on the job (fell and damaged vertebrae/discs in lower back pretty badly).
I properly documented it with a "incident report" through the company's HR dept, complete with witnesses and was treated @ the hospital.
Fast forward to about 2 years ago:
Been having continued issues with my back since the original injury, saw a specialist and was advised that I needed surgery.
Received the surgery and was "mostly better" for a few months, but slowly returned to being in constant/non-stop pain.
Recent MRI showed ruptured discs are about as bad (again) now as they were before the surgery. Time for another surgery probably.
Things at work have been slow all winter and since I'd been there for almost 5 years I'd worked myself into a good position where light duty work was my assigned duty. This was good for me as I likely couldn't have done the more heavy duty stuff normally associated with our trade with my back being bad like it has.
Well things haven't gotten any better for the company and I was recently told that there was no more light duty stuff available for me, so I agreed to take a lay-off.
Since I'm basically "on the gimp" here I don't know if I can cut it signing on with another contractor where I'd likely have to start off back out in the field doing regular heavy duty work, so I 'm thinking about hitting the comp insurance co again here as I'm basically unable to work due to the continuing decline of my health/abilities from this injury.
They have been pretty good to deal with really so far, and agreed to pay for the surgery and all associated costs before, even though it was over 2 years from the date of the original injury date.
I just kind of wonder what they are going to say now since I've been laid off?
Will they try to say "well we aren't liable for your lack of ability to work because you didn't have a job to go back to even if you were able". ?
I don't know...
Just wonder if there's anything in particular that I want to avoid saying? (Not trying to be deceptive or lie about anything, just wondering how to handle it, as I know their job is to try getting out of paying out on claims).
I've never before asked them for any type pf monetary compensation other than taking care of the medical costs.
They did however at one time a couple years back order me to have a "physical impairment evaluation" done, where they had a Dr evaluate how much of a percentage I was premanently physically disabled due to the injury. They then paid out a lump sum amount check based on the percentage of impairment the Dr said I'd sustained.
I really wish I'd known that was what was going on at teh time, as I took a ton of pain killers prior to doing the (4-hour) physical evaluation tasks.
Had I known all that prior I'd have elected to do the physical evaluation's tasks without taking the pain meds to make it more of an "apples to apples" comparison with my abilities in the work place.
I certainly wouldn't take pain meds like that at work, so their evaluation of my physical abilities from that evaluation were really nothing like what I could bring to the table in a work type environment...
I wonder if I could get them to re do that evaluation w/o the meds? I doubt it.
So anyway, that's about where I'm at here with this, anyone have any similar experiences or advise to offer?
Thanks