When the Monte was setup to drive on the street a 950 hp that actually flowed 830 or whatever was quicker then a dominater on it. Two different dominaters tried. That was with a 750 horsepower 540ci Rat. The switch to the 950 HP was when it really started pulling the front tires.I have heard the old original 950 flowed about 830, but that the latest ultra hp actually flowed 950. But it is the internet........
Interesting.I've had a fair amount of carbs across my flow bench. Here is what I saw.
Holley 4781 850 1.56 venturi .......... 960 CFM
HP 950 - Zinc 1.375 venturi .... 854 CFM
Ultra 950 Aluminum 1.600 venturi ...... 960 CFM
Ultra 850 Aluminum 1.56 venturi ...... 1019 CFM
Quick Fuel 950 1.45 venturi ......... 960 CFM
Quick Fuel 1000 1.50 venturi ......... 976 CFM
Quick Fuel 1050 1.56 venturi ......... 1019 CFM
Demon RS 975 1.50 venturi ......... 1006 CFM
I would expect the zinc body HP 1000 to flow similar to the Quick Fuel 1050 or the Ultra 850.
Notice that that the Holley Ultra 850 flows more than the Ultra 950 despite the larger venturi. I flowed two different 950's with the same results, and back to back with the 850. The Ultra 850 is a better choice. Also note that the Quick Fuel 950 flows the same as the Ultra 950 with a smaller venturi, it also has a much stronger booster signal than the Ultra 950 and also is a better choice. As far as the Quick Fuel 850, it has a 1.400 venturi and while I have not had it on a flow bench it likely flows between 860 and 900 CFM, less than the Ultra 950, so as long as the engine still distributed fuel well the Ultra 950 would make more power. However of all the carbs that flowed the same or more than the Ultra 950 ALL of them had a better booster signal than the Ultra 950, so it would be at the bottom of my list.
As far as what to use for the OP, if it is a street only car the HP 950 you have is a fine choice as the smaller venturi provide a very good booster signal, throttle response will be good as a result. If you run at the track and want more out of it the Quick Fuel 1000 or 1050 would be my choice. If you want to stick with Holley either the HP 1000 or Ultra 850.
![]()
Thanks for the good info Mark. :yes:I've had a fair amount of carbs across my flow bench. Here is what I saw.
Holley 4781 850 1.56 venturi .......... 960 CFM
HP 950 - Zinc 1.375 venturi .... 854 CFM
Ultra 950 Aluminum 1.600 venturi ...... 960 CFM
Ultra 850 Aluminum 1.56 venturi ...... 1019 CFM
Quick Fuel 950 1.45 venturi ......... 960 CFM
Quick Fuel 1000 1.50 venturi ......... 976 CFM
Quick Fuel 1050 1.56 venturi ......... 1019 CFM
Demon RS 975 1.50 venturi ......... 1006 CFM
I would expect the zinc body HP 1000 to flow similar to the Quick Fuel 1050 or the Ultra 850.
Notice that that the Holley Ultra 850 flows more than the Ultra 950 despite the larger venturi. I flowed two different 950's with the same results, and back to back with the 850. The Ultra 850 is a better choice. Also note that the Quick Fuel 950 flows the same as the Ultra 950 with a smaller venturi, it also has a much stronger booster signal than the Ultra 950 and also is a better choice. As far as the Quick Fuel 850, it has a 1.400 venturi and while I have not had it on a flow bench it likely flows between 860 and 900 CFM, less than the Ultra 950, so as long as the engine still distributed fuel well the Ultra 950 would make more power. However of all the carbs that flowed the same or more than the Ultra 950 ALL of them had a better booster signal than the Ultra 950, so it would be at the bottom of my list.
As far as what to use for the OP, if it is a street only car the HP 950 you have is a fine choice as the smaller venturi provide a very good booster signal, throttle response will be good as a result. If you run at the track and want more out of it the Quick Fuel 1000 or 1050 would be my choice. If you want to stick with Holley either the HP 1000 or Ultra 850.
![]()