Team Chevelle banner
1 - 10 of 10 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
215 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I have heard that its a bad idea to run a low gear like a 4:10 with a stock cam, whats the reason behind that? Does that go for a standard car to or just an auto? Thanks, Joe
 

· Registered
Joined
·
99 Posts
Nothing wrong with doing a gear change to improve performance with a stock cam although a cam upgrade plus a gear change would probably produce better performance. A change from say a lazy 2.73 gear to a 3.73 gear would make a world of difference without a cam change, even more performance with a cam change.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
7,226 Posts
Nothing wrong with doing a gear change to improve performance with a stock cam although a cam upgrade plus a gear change would probably produce better performance. A change from say a lazy 2.73 gear to a 3.73 gear would make a world of difference without a cam change, even more performance with a cam change.
x2. :yes: Gears alone will wake up a car REAL quick, especially a manual shift car.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,739 Posts
Going too far though, you'll have the situation where the engine RPMs get too high too quick, and you get out of its power band.

If you've ever driven a car that felt like it would pull a house down from a stop, but the engine was screaming with RPM while being unable to pass a truck at 60 mph, that's what happens when you have "too much gear". Which IMO is actually "not enough motor", rather than "too much gear".
 

· Registered
Joined
·
518 Posts
its the other way around... you dont want to run a higher numerical gear with a higher upper rpm band cam.. ie a cam that comes in @ 2500 with a 2:73 gear
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,739 Posts
It's both ways.

As a case in point, one of my little brothers had, some years ago, a 84 Z28 LG4 auto trans. Yerbasic typical stock tractor motor; put one on a chassis dyno, and it makes peak torque the instant the run starts, and decreases constantly from there.

Came with 3.23 gears. The car I had at the time, a 83 Z28 L69/T-5 3.73, could take off from behind his, pull out, pass it, and pull back in in front of it, by the time I shifted to 3rd gear.

He was cruising the junkyard and came across a wrecked HO Z28, and snarfed its rear. 3.73s of course. (I ganked the hydraulic clutch system from the same car and put it in mine... got that stupid Stone Age linkage crap out of it. 2nd best mod I ever did to it, right behind getting rid of the stock shifter, and right in front of LCA relocation brackets.)

It became EXACTLY as I just described: it could SMOKE just about anything off the line if it hooked up, but was almost impossible to drive on the freeway without getting run over. It took about 15 seconds and a quarter tank of gas to get from 60 to 65 mph. Wouldn't even go 70 unless it was down a long steep hill.

That's what happens with "too much gear".

The "not enough gear" problem is pretty severe too, but it's the opposite. That's where the car has NO LEAVE WHATSOEVER, but if you leave it in 1st gear until about 70 mph, it almost seems like it's got some power. That's what hapens with a race setup motor in a stock-geared car.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
7,226 Posts
My hat is off to you sir. Any man that can use a form of the word gank and the word snarf in the same idea is, in my book, a scholar and a gentleman. :D :beers::D

I am surprised that such a small ratio change would have such a big effect, from 3.23 to 3.73.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
2,265 Posts
It's both ways.

As a case in point, one of my little brothers had, some years ago, a 84 Z28 LG4 auto trans. Yerbasic typical stock tractor motor; put one on a chassis dyno, and it makes peak torque the instant the run starts, and decreases constantly from there.

Came with 3.23 gears. The car I had at the time, a 83 Z28 L69/T-5 3.73, could take off from behind his, pull out, pass it, and pull back in in front of it, by the time I shifted to 3rd gear.

He was cruising the junkyard and came across a wrecked HO Z28, and snarfed its rear. 3.73s of course. (I ganked the hydraulic clutch system from the same car and put it in mine... got that stupid Stone Age linkage crap out of it. 2nd best mod I ever did to it, right behind getting rid of the stock shifter, and right in front of LCA relocation brackets.)

It became EXACTLY as I just described: it could SMOKE just about anything off the line if it hooked up, but was almost impossible to drive on the freeway without getting run over. It took about 15 seconds and a quarter tank of gas to get from 60 to 65 mph. Wouldn't even go 70 unless it was down a long steep hill.

That's what happens with "too much gear".

The "not enough gear" problem is pretty severe too, but it's the opposite. That's where the car has NO LEAVE WHATSOEVER, but if you leave it in 1st gear until about 70 mph, it almost seems like it's got some power. That's what hapens with a race setup motor in a stock-geared car.
:yes: I have 2.56's in my car right now, its gutless off the line!
 
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top