Team Chevelle banner
1 - 10 of 10 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
4,726 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Buddy asked me what it's worth, it's a real one not an Gm performance parts one and I have no idea, any of you guys know what the value of a pump like this goes for? I just use the aftermarket and he wants me to put it on my car. I told him it might be worth something to someone.
 

· Premium Member
1968 Malibu sport coupe, 489 ci. 590 hp 600 tq, RV T-400 Freakshow 3200 stall, 3.73 12 bolt posi
Joined
·
11,579 Posts
Maybe ask in a Corvette Forum? I think a vette owner that's restoring a #'s matching car would want it but as far as value I wouldn't have a clue
 

· Registered
Joined
·
4,726 Posts
Discussion Starter · #5 ·
I have to go and look at the numbers again, Tracy Performance has the exact same pump with the same ID numbers on it. The L88 pumps are all aluminum and I did look at my other 2 GM Performance ones and those have different part numbers. I will ask some of my the Vette guys, they are kind of shady as they will ask to buy it for like $25 and say it's not worth anything.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
7,310 Posts
I can't find any evidence of an L88 specific water pump. Colvin's book lists the L88 receiving the same pump as any big block. Things may have changed with the over the counter later L88s??
Correct. its the same pump used on all BB
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
2,181 Posts
Courtesy CRG:
I think it was only the ZL1 that got the aluminum pump.
In production form, the engine differed from Can-Am configuration. The dry-sump oil passage was eliminated and provision for a mechanical fuel pump added. Production tooling was developed for the block (castings #3946052/53), cylinder heads (#3946074), and intake manifold (#3933198). A new aluminum water pump was to be included (and at least one and perhaps two Camaros were built with it), but last minute testing raised reliability questions.
 
1 - 10 of 10 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top