[1971-Chevelle]

I fail to see how they can call this one a masterpiece:

Purple Rain Chevelle: From Rendering To Masterpiece

This car is a true prince!

www.motorious.com

 

[MALIB8TR]

Barf! Choke!

 

[Leadhead]

Waste of a good car.

 

[Derek69SS]

Tires are too narrow to pull off a wide-body look.

I have tires wider than that under my stock fender openings.

 

[Alwhite00]

As long as it doesn't have any suspension it should be fine. 😁

 

[elco68]

I'm old and 6' so I need a car that has a up stance to it.

 

[ABodyDust.]

I always wonder how a widebody A body would look. Now I know how it looks done wrong.

Sent from my LM-G820 using Tapatalk

 

[-SS454-]

Wow they butchered that rendering. The entire rear of the car is wayyyy off. Not sure if accurate body lines would make it much better though.

 

[-SS454-]

Tires are too narrow to pull off a wide-body look.

I have tires wider than that under my stock fender openings.

I'd say those are minimum 315s in the back, if not 335s. But when you can fit that size tire with a mini tub under Chevelle, moving the wheels outward 4-5 inches just makes it look weird.

 

[68Chevele]

That's not a Masterpiece that a Big old Piece of ****. Talk about Fugly.

 

[kmakar]

Looks more like Mad Max meets 2021..... people with nothing better to do have to mess up something that's already good just the way it is.

 

[Capt Casey]

From Rendering To Masterpiece = Barf
have to agree if you are into Salvdor Dahli art At least there may be some good parts on it...
But then again beauty is in the eye of the beholder right? I'd have to be blind......but hey

 

[Derek69SS]

I'd say those are minimum 315s in the back, if not 335s. But when you can fit that size tire with a mini tub under Chevelle, moving the wheels outward 4-5 inches just makes it look weird.

315s fit a 68-72 rear without even a mini-tub. I had 315s on my '69 with just trimmed lips, and the 70-72 bodies have even more room than 68-69. The fronts look 275-285 ish, which you can also fit under stock fenders while running stock inner fenders and a low stance.

I'll be running 295/35/18 Yokohama A052 (11" tread width, 11.8" section width) on 10.5" square this year.
BFG Rival S 315s fit the rear without rubbing but it was really tight. Yoks run wide and have a soft sidewall, so I can't quite fit a 315 rear with them. They're almost 1/2" wider than the same size BFG.

 

[shovelrick]

That Chevelle is CRYING Help Me!, Help Me!, Crappy UNfinished Mad Maxing it job, BTW 295/55r15" MT ET DR are about as wide as I can fit under my 68 but I have a 1/4" spacer in my 2 series carrier for a 3.73 gear set, brings the pass side a 1/4" closer to the fender lip, maybe a 305??

 

[Bonkerman]

Knock the windows out of it and put a number on the door and it will look like a 70's roundy round car.

 

[blm]

Knock the windows out of it and put a number on the door and it will look like a 70's roundy round car.

Kinda what I was thinking. Will say ive seen a lot worse offerings of an ultimate Chevelle.

 

[DZAUTO]

I refuse to comment!

 

[Leadhead]

The back end looks weird like almost a non fastback Cutlass.

 

[shovelrick]

I'd like to have the $$$ they wasted on this 🤣

 

[Dean]

🤣