J
Jeff
·Guest
Joined
·
0 Posts
Hi All,
I know we have beat this issue to death, but here is my dilemma. I have a '69 SS with 396, headers, Flowmaster 2.5" pipes, and Flowmaster 3 chamber mufflers. The system is much too loud for my taste. It sounds great, but too loud. I have see postings on this site that say the Walker DynoMax Hemi Turbos are much quieter. How much quieter? When I had my flowmasters installed, the muffler connections were welded. There will be substantial cutting involved to replace the mufflers. Because of this, I don't want to spend this money to have the DynoMax's installed if they are only slightly quieter. Have any of you had both the Flowmaster and DynoMax on your big-block car? I am looking for a substantial reduction in noise. Would you say the DynoMax sound is closer to a stock muffler sound, or more like a Flowmaster? I would also consider a stock muffler. However, I don't want to kill the performance.
Thanks,
Jeff
I know we have beat this issue to death, but here is my dilemma. I have a '69 SS with 396, headers, Flowmaster 2.5" pipes, and Flowmaster 3 chamber mufflers. The system is much too loud for my taste. It sounds great, but too loud. I have see postings on this site that say the Walker DynoMax Hemi Turbos are much quieter. How much quieter? When I had my flowmasters installed, the muffler connections were welded. There will be substantial cutting involved to replace the mufflers. Because of this, I don't want to spend this money to have the DynoMax's installed if they are only slightly quieter. Have any of you had both the Flowmaster and DynoMax on your big-block car? I am looking for a substantial reduction in noise. Would you say the DynoMax sound is closer to a stock muffler sound, or more like a Flowmaster? I would also consider a stock muffler. However, I don't want to kill the performance.
Thanks,
Jeff