Team Chevelle banner
1 - 11 of 11 Posts

· Premium Member
Joined
·
237 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Ok Mark now what??

I followed your recommendation in another post concerning pushing out the short ball joint from my GW lower arms and found that the Howe tall ball joints that I purchased from SC&C don't fit at all. Gokou says that the GW ball joints are Moog "Problem fixer" units and as such are larger in overall diameter. Well he's right. Does Howe make a larger diameter balljoint body to fit into the GW lower arms?? I'm sitting with one arm busted down till I get an answer and the other arm I won't touch till I get an answer. I'm a bit miffed at spending $170 bucks on Howe lower balljoints that I can't even use at this point.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
237 Posts
Discussion Starter · #4 ·
LateNight72,

The joint is VERY loose in the arm... Tacking them in won't help out at all. The Howe joint wallows around badly. It's not even an issue trying to put them in at this point. It wouldn't be so bad, but the joint I pressed out came apart so I can't even reinstall it.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
583 Posts
I have the BJs that cam out of my SPC / SC&C lowers just sitting around and I'm in CA.
You pick um up you can have um CHEAP!
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
464 Posts
I already responded to this in the other post here. I still no phone call...
The Howe ball joints are OEM size. The size GM originally made them. 99% of the time they fit fine in aftermarket arms even thought they had oversized ball joints in them. I`ve pressed them into GW arms several times myself with no problem. Measure the Howe ball joints and you`ll find they`re spot on. If the bores are so big you can`t even tack them in then the bores in the arms are way oversized.
Give me a call and we`ll get you fixed up. Don`t get angry,this is all just part of hotrodding. If it was easy anybody could do it. ;) Mark SC&C
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
464 Posts
Oh,it just occured to me. If the GW lower arms were originally intended for use with B spindles they use B body sized (larger body) ball joints rather than the hybrid machined down ball joints used in stock lower arms. That might explain it and it would be a quick and easy fix. If that`s the case just send the BJs back to us and we`ll swap the housings for free. Mark SC&C
 

· Registered
Joined
·
448 Posts
Oh,it just occured to me. If the GW lower arms were originally intended for use with B spindles they use B body sized (larger body) ball joints rather than the hybrid machined down ball joints used in stock lower arms. That might explain it and it would be a quick and easy fix. If that`s the case just send the BJs back to us and we`ll swap the housings for free. Mark SC&C
that could explain it, I selected the "stock" option when ordering mine, hence the tall ball joints worked fine, B-body was an option, I can see how someone could equate AFX = B-body and select that.
 

· Premium Member
Joined
·
237 Posts
Discussion Starter · #11 ·
Sorry Mark,

It turns out that YOU hit the nail on the head. Went out this evening and did some inspecting. The arms I have are for the B-Body tall spindle setup after going back to GW's site and comparing invoice Part Numbers, however that's not what I ordered OR so I thought~ There is no way to identify the arms by just looking at them since I can find NO part numbers anywhere on them. I will need to get the one arm back to normal and try and return these for the STOCK replacement arms.

I don't know what would happen by using these "Negative Roll" arms with stock spindles if the balljoints were changed over to a "stock" taper tall ball joint with a larger body. I have 459 CNR 42L arms and needed 459 CTA 42L "G-Plus" arms.
 
1 - 11 of 11 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top