The dur. @ .050 is 234/244 with .488/.510 lift.
How would higher than 3,500 stall work on the street? I don't drive on the street for long distances, but if I did go for a long cruise in it, wouldn't it heat up the trans a lot more? With the car, I'm basically aiming for strip duty but still reliable on the street. I have had this car a daily driver once before when my truck was in the shop, would like to retain some of that ability.
Anyone ever have a cheap converter like mine and do a swap? I want to see how much difference. Don't get me wrong, I'm sold on the higher end converter so I will upgrade.
There are plans after my deployment to go with either a 177 blower or big inch small block(427/434/454). The new converter would come at the same time. So torque would be higher.
OK, that's actualy a much milder
[email protected] spec than I had suspected, and a 3,000 stall speed RPM would be fine with that cam. But just to answer your questions, efficient torque converters (which will often cost more $$) will usually create less heat than a cheap one will which haves a high slippage percentage, and that often holds true regardless of what the chosen stall speed RPM is.
Don't get me wrong though. Having a higher stall speed RPM will increase the potential for heat, but the higher stal speed is not the only factor of influence there. If for instance you have a torque converter that is very inefficient and displays 12 or 13% of slippage at wide open throttle obove 3,000 RPM with the stall speed RPM being at 3,000 RPM, then that will be an additional cause of heat build up since your converter is in effect always slipping to a significant degree at all RPM right up to the engine redline. having a decent transmission fluid cooler helps a lot, but some very efficient torque converters won't even need a cooler using a 3,000 RPM stall speed RPM.
I had a car that I drag raced in which I replaced the stock torque converter when the car had only 4,000 MILES on it's odometer with an $800 aftermarket converter from Precision Industries. it was a 9.5" diameter piece, and the manufacture garanteed that this converter would reduce my ET's by atleast .5 seconds.
Wel, my ET reduction exceeded their claims because my car then ran .7 seconds faster than it had before with the factory stock torque converter on. However I must admit that the stock converter reporteldy had a 2,300 RPM stall speed, and i told the converter manufacture that i wanted a 3,000 RPM stall speed, so I'm sure that the highher stal speed RPM of the new converter also contributed to the lower ET's.