this is true assuming nothing else changed, but aluminum heads can tolerate about a point higher compression (due to the heat loss) than iron heads without detonation becoming a factor. so if you up the compression accordingly to put the power back in the same ballpark and lose the weight, where does that leave you?David_Bates said:Typically, an aluminum headed engine will make less power than a comparable iron headed engine as they dissipate too much heat in the combustion process. Loss of heat, loss of power! The question you have to answer is will the loss of power be offset by the weight savings!
troposcuba said:... so if you up the compression accordingly to put the power back in the same ballpark and lose the weight, where does that leave you?
Do you really think GM or any other manufacturer would charge extra for aluminum heads and tell you the truth that the engine will make less power? The above statements are true . . .period!supersport396_2000 said:I found this on the net, from the above comments it can't be true.
From 69 specs
L78 V8 396 cid 4.09 x 3.76 375 @ 5600 420 @ 3600 1 x 4bbl. 11.0:1
L89 V8 396 cid 4.09 x 3.76 375 @ 5600 420 @ 3600 1 x 4bbl. 11.0:1