First let me say I don't agree with most of what was said here other than the post about leaving the valve size alone.
Fat seats are not as important as where the seat is. The seat width will widen as the motor runs, if you put the seat on the edge of the valve like a race prepared head, it will go away much faster than one moved more toward the middle. Fat or thicker exhaust valves or one with more "margin", is more desirable. I used larger diameter valve and trimmed them for the smaller applications. We also back cut all the valves at 30 degrees, helps flow in low velocity situations.
A good three-angle valve job is a thing of beauty and can help improve flow.
I don't like replacing seats, and here is why. There is very little room for error when working on early heads. They were never intended to have replacement seats. The area under the valve is thin; water is lurking close and hand. The exhaust seat operates at extreme temperature and unless the crush on the seat and the seat thickness is good, it will fall out and kill the bullet.
I run so much crush on these babies it's ridiculous, .008. You need to freeze the seat with dry ice then install it.
I had one disaster on early heads, dropped the seat out and blew a hole in a piston and cracked the block.
As for the guides, I use solid bronze replacement guides. I never had a set of heads that were so far out that I could not put the seat in.
I have seen the .500 guide installed, then a liner installed in that. What is that all about?
I have seen people drive the old guide out the wrong way, ugly.
If you look at the newer aftermarket heads you will see the difference in the seats, much thicker.
Maybe I'm gun shy about seats in early heads.
------------------
Wally
Gold #67
67 malibu
[This message has been edited by Wally (edited 08-09-99).]
[This message has been edited by Wally (edited 08-09-99).]