11.5 mpg 396? - Chevelle Tech
Performance Our High Performance area

 39Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
post #1 of 73 (permalink) Old Sep 6th, 19, 5:15 PM Thread Starter
Team Member
Steve
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 116
11.5 mpg 396?

Is it common for a 396 to get about 11.5 mpg? The block has been bored .30 over to a 402, Oval port heads that now have .188 / .202 valves, 10.25 CR, Edelbrock performer rpm air gap, Holley 670SA vac. secondaries with 65 main jets, 35 squirter nozzle, purple secondary spring and a 8.5 PV. The cam is ISKY 270 grind hyd. .293 cam lift, .510 valve lift, 216 duration @ .050, 114 lobe center. Cam p/n 396270. Turbo 400 with 3.55 gears. Tachs 3200 @70 mph with 26 inch tires. I'd like to squeeze another mile or two per gallon out of her if it's possible.
68elky396 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 73 (permalink) Old Sep 6th, 19, 5:24 PM
Gold Founding Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: 30.1298228, -97.9771166
Posts: 6,332
Garage
Re: 11.5 mpg 396?

You might get it to 13 or 14 but it’s going to take some judicious tuning and staying off the loud pedal. I think slowing down the accelerator pump will make the biggest change. Otherwise you need an OD trans and economy still won’t be great.
NickeyChevelle likes this.

Mencken: “The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.”
Alan F is offline  
post #3 of 73 (permalink) Old Sep 6th, 19, 6:08 PM
Lifetime Premium Member
Brian
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 2,909
Garage
Re: 11.5 mpg 396?

You should be dang happy you are getting that kind of mileage - I can only dream. My small block 377 averages about 7 MPG, with a Turbo 400, 2,500 RPM stall converter, 3.42 gears, and an Edelbrock Thunder AVS 2 800.
NickeyChevelle likes this.

1971 Malibu, factory buckets/full gauges/console, 377 roller cammed small block, Turbo 400, 3.42 10 bolt posi (Buick), - All your base are belong to us.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


My Chevelle w/ open headers:
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


My Chevelle w/ 2.5 pipes + X crossover/18 inch glass packs:

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
WakkoWarner is offline  
 
post #4 of 73 (permalink) Old Sep 6th, 19, 6:15 PM Thread Starter
Team Member
Steve
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 116
Thanks for the response Alan,
When I checked the mpg the other day, 95% of the miles put on were interstate and the rest of it was light footing it around town. Not sure what you mean by slowing down the accelerator pump? Are you referring to squirter size or pump cam profile?
Steve
68elky396 is offline  
post #5 of 73 (permalink) Old Sep 6th, 19, 6:18 PM
Senior Tech Team
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Shippensburg, PA
Posts: 4,686
How’s your timing curve set-up? You running vacuum advance? I would think that combo should do 15-16 mpg easy unless you are running down the highway at 80 mph.

I would ditch the air-gap manifold and put some heat into the manifold. Good atomization of the fuel is important for efficiency, and the air-gap isn’t helping that cause. Even a non air-gap manifold with a blocked crossover would be a better fit.
novadude is offline  
post #6 of 73 (permalink) Old Sep 6th, 19, 6:27 PM
Lifetime Premium Member
Beth
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 1,456
Garage
Re: 11.5 mpg 396?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 68elky396 View Post
Is it common for a 396 to get about 11.5 mpg? The block has been bored .30 over to a 402, Oval port heads that now have .188 / .202 valves, 10.25 CR, Edelbrock performer rpm air gap, Holley 670SA vac. secondaries with 65 main jets, 35 squirter nozzle, purple secondary spring and a 8.5 PV. The cam is ISKY 270 grind hyd. .293 cam lift, .510 valve lift, 216 duration @ .050, 114 lobe center. Cam p/n 396270. Turbo 400 with 3.55 gears. Tachs 3200 @70 mph with 26 inch tires. I'd like to squeeze another mile or two per gallon out of her if it's possible.
28" tires will help some. A 4L80e would really be nice but pricey

Quote:
Originally Posted by novadude View Post
How’s your timing curve set-up? You running vacuum advance? I would think that combo should do 15-16 mpg easy unless you are running down the highway at 80 mph.

I would ditch the air-gap manifold and put some heat into the manifold. Good atomization of the fuel is important for efficiency, and the air-gap isn’t helping that cause. Even a non air-gap manifold with a blocked crossover would be a better fit.
Vacuum advance will help a lot if you don't have it hooked to full manifold vacuum.

I'm switching to a factory q-jet intake (cast iron) that has delivered some amazing dyno numbers by CPMotorworks (a member here). You can get a q-jet with 800 cfm capacity. The spreadbore speed demon 750 is only $350.
Kirk's67SS likes this.

67 Chevelle convertible, 138 vin, original 4 speed, bucket seats, Marina Blue with black interior
nashville beth is offline  
post #7 of 73 (permalink) Old Sep 6th, 19, 6:33 PM
Senior Tech Team
Vince
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Thornton, Pa
Posts: 13,533
Re: 11.5 mpg 396?

I dont think anything cruising at 3200 rpms will get any mileage.

*69 SS 502 EFI /224* HR/9.8:1/T56/3.90/ 4000lbs RW 11.5/124mph
*11 C6, 6.2, 6spd
*96 Stang 6.0 turbo 10.5/135mph
*2011 Mustang GT premium
*61" Scag Kohler 22hp 7mph
69-CHVL is offline  
post #8 of 73 (permalink) Old Sep 6th, 19, 7:24 PM Thread Starter
Team Member
Steve
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 116
Nova,
Thanks for the response. Yes, MSD ignition hooked up to full manifold vacuum. As far as the timing curve goes, initial at 18* total 38* all in around 2500. I have been considering swapping out the manifold back to the original cast iron and a QJet. Or a Weiand Stealth or regular performer. I would have to restore the original intake as it has light rust from being left outside when I was much younger and not as wise. 😕
Steve
68elky396 is offline  
post #9 of 73 (permalink) Old Sep 6th, 19, 7:31 PM Thread Starter
Team Member
Steve
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 116
Wakko, thanks for the response. I don't recall checking the mpg years ago in its stock configuration before I built the engine. I don't have any idea what type of mpg I can get out of it.
Steve
68elky396 is offline  
post #10 of 73 (permalink) Old Sep 6th, 19, 7:37 PM Thread Starter
Team Member
Steve
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 116
Nashville, thanks for the response. I won't be changing tire size as I'm very happy with the setup. As for the trans, I just built it and the expense would be great as you stated.
Steve
68elky396 is offline  
post #11 of 73 (permalink) Old Sep 6th, 19, 7:50 PM
Senior Tech Team
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 10,717
Re: 11.5 mpg 396?

Thats pretty good...not all mpg claims are true you see on the web...even my 02 1500 thats supposed to get 16-20..avgs 12.

My 67 with 383 cant figure it out. Literally 20 bux for 20 minutes of fun..tahts with 6 gears....worth every penny too.

Quote:
This post is a duplicate of a post that you have posted in the last five minutes.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
cuisinartvette is online now  
post #12 of 73 (permalink) Old Sep 6th, 19, 8:06 PM
Team Member
Tony
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 3,125
Garage
Re: 11.5 mpg 396?

I'd swap rear gears down to 3.08s or get a 200R4. And that's about it.

I wouldn't do anything else b/c you'll hurt performance.....and that motor was built with modest performance in mind.

Unless you are driving this every day (which you shouldn't be) trying to gain one or two MPG is purely an academic exercise. Your wallet will not notice it. But your right foot will.

Put another way, think about how much money you'd have to spend to do what was mentioned above. Contrast that to your actual fuel costs. Where is your break even point? This is an exercise unlikely to gain material results. If you want good MPG, you're in the wrong car.

So why bother?
71350SS, davewho1 and Stokerboats like this.

'69 Malibu 383/TCI TH350/8.2 3.36 Eaton Posi. Street Edge 10" 2800, E-Tec 170s, Custom Mike Jones HR Cam, RPM Air-Gap, StreetAvenger 770, Pertronix HEI, Hedman 1 5/8" Headers, Moser Axles, PMT 1320R Kit. [email protected] 111 MPH, 1.6865 60 ft, Nitto 555
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
blue_69_malibu is offline  
post #13 of 73 (permalink) Old Sep 6th, 19, 8:19 PM
Tech Team
Kerry
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Lloydminster, Alberta
Posts: 842
Re: 11.5 mpg 396?

Put a wideband on it, and get the cruise tuned to a crisp 14.5:1 range. That is the only way to improve the steady throttle economy. You may be able to dial in a couple more degrees timing also.

For economy when you are opening it up more at times, a stiffer black secondary spring will slow the secondary opening and may also help.
pockets is offline  
post #14 of 73 (permalink) Old Sep 6th, 19, 8:36 PM
Lifetime Premium Member
Beth
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 1,456
Garage
Re: 11.5 mpg 396?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 69-CHVL View Post
I dont think anything cruising at 3200 rpms will get any mileage.
I had a 66 SS396-325 hp years ago with 4 speed and 3:55 gears that got a consistent 18 mpg @ 3000 rpm.

That 325 hp cam was pretty small. :-)
CPMotorworks likes this.

67 Chevelle convertible, 138 vin, original 4 speed, bucket seats, Marina Blue with black interior
nashville beth is offline  
post #15 of 73 (permalink) Old Sep 6th, 19, 8:58 PM
Senior Tech Team
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 10,717
Re: 11.5 mpg 396?

Id think the best mpg is where that sweet spot is not so much rpm


Full size 5.3 truck gets the same mpg in D around 60-65 as it does in OD and actually feels better. Over that mpg drops without that extra gear.
On the street I dont think OD is worth it

Quote:
This post is a duplicate of a post that you have posted in the last five minutes.

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
cuisinartvette is online now  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Chevelle Tech forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address. Note, you will be sent a confirmation request to this address.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in













Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome