Thermal vs. Non-Thermal Fan Clutch - Chevelle Tech
Chevelle Tech join team chevelle as a supporting member  
Chevelle Parts at SS396.com      
GROUND UP & SS396.com         
Official Sponsor of Team Chevelle
     

Auto Insurance

Chevelles.com is the premier Chevrolet Chevelle Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Engine AdvertisementGeneral Engine Discussion.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old Jun 22nd, 03, 10:55 PM
Bow_Tied Bow_Tied is offline
Gold Founding Member
Ron
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,300
Post

Hi guys:

Would like to know the difference between the two types of fan clutches, and which is considered better for a performance street-driven car (BBC if it matters) with a 7 blade fan?

All comments are appreciated.
__________________
Ron Cook
'69 300 Deluxe SS396
My GM Canada Documentation

Founding member of The CanAm Chevelle Club
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old Jun 23rd, 03, 2:18 AM
BB_Mike BB_Mike is offline
Team Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 4,974
Post

Thermal clutch: The rate at which the fan spins is not the same as the water pump's shaft. The speed of the fan is directly proportional to the heat of the motor & the water pump's shaft. Hence the "clutch" part. Laymens terms: It slips and doesn't spin as fast while the motor is cold... then spins more as the motor heats up.

Non-thermal clutch: speed is directly coupled to the water pump's shaft.

The latter is usually cheaper and will not wear out of time. The thermal will (like any slipping system) begin to slip more over time and you loose efficiency and cooling ability.

however, living in a cold place (get's pretty cold up there 'ey?) the thermal-clutch fan is preffered, as it allows your motor to come to operating temperatures sooner.

Besides, when they built these cars some brainiac thought up this thermal clutch for a reason. [img]smile.gif[/img]

That'll be $10 (american) [img]graemlins/thumbsup.gif[/img]
__________________
member number 684
71' coupe project:
goal: 150+MPH, 9s driven to and from track, 275 front tire, 315 rear tire, 1000+HP
Build: 540cid, twin turbo, 4L80e, ...wait for it...

Heart of Dixie Chevelle Club
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #3  
Old Jun 23rd, 03, 8:28 AM
427L88 427L88 is offline
Gold Member
Gene
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 10,574
Post

While I dont dispute anything Mike says, I chose the simpler, CHEAPER mechanical clutch. Works mint. Least it doesnt spin at 7000 rpms anymore!
__________________
Gene
ACES 3112/Team Chevelle Gold #62
Be big, be a 'builder'!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #4  
Old Jun 23rd, 03, 8:36 AM
mr 4 speed mr 4 speed is offline
Lifetime Premium Member
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Under the hood of some musclecar
Posts: 22,759
Post

I always run non thermal clutches on my cars..never a problem with running hot/or overheating
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #5  
Old Jun 23rd, 03, 9:21 AM
DjD DjD is offline
Team Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,492
Post

Just a quick correction to Mikes nonthermal definetion... It too slips or it wouldn't be any different than the mechanical fan Gene uses. The nonthermal is tighter or spins closer to engine rpm at lower rpms (when it is needed the most for cooling) and then as rpm increases it loosens up (slips more) and spins at a lower rpm than the engine.
__________________
...Dennis
The '69, the '96 and The El Camino
Team Camaro
Camaros Limited
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #6  
Old Jun 23rd, 03, 1:09 PM
Bow_Tied Bow_Tied is offline
Gold Founding Member
Ron
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,300
Post

Thanks guys, that was my guess.

It sure is cold up here Mike, I just took the v-plow off the velle for the summer!

Is there a reason besides cost that leads you to the non-thermal (because they will spin at high rpms?)?

How do they work? I guess the non-thermal is a centripal weight set-up?

Does anyone have a GM part# for a the non-thermal type?
TIA
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #7  
Old Jun 23rd, 03, 7:22 PM
Daves68 Daves68 is offline
Tech Team
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Milford Ct. USA
Posts: 76
Post

Hey Bow_Tied, Is Eastown Chevrolet still around,My 68 SS came from London Ontario..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #8  
Old Jun 23rd, 03, 7:31 PM
Bow_Tied Bow_Tied is offline
Gold Founding Member
Ron
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,300
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Daves68:
Hey Bow_Tied, Is Eastown Chevrolet still around,My 68 SS came from London Ontario..
Sort of - It is now called MacMaster Chev/Olds, 1470 Dunda St., (519)455-6200. I have found the parts guys there nice, but quite useless if the computer cannot tell them the answer with 30 seconds. No time for the little guy I guess.

Have you purchased your GM Canada documentation/build info?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #9  
Old Jun 23rd, 03, 11:02 PM
BB_Mike BB_Mike is offline
Team Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 4,974
Post

I did manage to screw that up didn't I.
Once you go electric, you forget all of those "details".
__________________
member number 684
71' coupe project:
goal: 150+MPH, 9s driven to and from track, 275 front tire, 315 rear tire, 1000+HP
Build: 540cid, twin turbo, 4L80e, ...wait for it...

Heart of Dixie Chevelle Club
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #10  
Old Jun 23rd, 03, 11:04 PM
DjD DjD is offline
Team Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,492
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by Bow_Tied:
Thanks guys, that was my guess.

It sure is cold up here Mike, I just took the v-plow off the velle for the summer!

Is there a reason besides cost that leads you to the non-thermal (because they will spin at high rpms?)?

How do they work? I guess the non-thermal is a centripal weight set-up?

Does anyone have a GM part# for a the non-thermal type?
TIA
Here's a good thread on fans on the camaro site...

http://www.camaros.net/cgi-bin/forum...;f=19;t=000064

I'm using a nonthremal from summit that the fan and clutch were very reasonable. I post number and cost in the link...
__________________
...Dennis
The '69, the '96 and The El Camino
Team Camaro
Camaros Limited
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #11  
Old Jun 23rd, 03, 11:22 PM
Bow_Tied Bow_Tied is offline
Gold Founding Member
Ron
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,300
Post

Thank-you Dennis, that was an informative thread - I had no idea the HP differences between mechancial and electric!
Ron
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #12  
Old Jun 24th, 03, 4:31 PM
Daves68 Daves68 is offline
Tech Team
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Milford Ct. USA
Posts: 76
Post

Thanks Bow_Tied, The GM info from Canada came with the car when I bought it, Nice little packet of info...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #13  
Old Jun 24th, 03, 7:37 PM
Cam Cam is offline
Gold Founding Member
Cameron Milne
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 5,189
Post

A quote from a 1970 Pontiac engineering brochure: "Fans. They cool. They also eat horsepower. Conventional fans slurp up 20-24 horses @ 6000 fan rpm. Flex fans, about 5 or 6. And a clutch fan, about 4 or 5 horses. Take your choice. Why the difference? The flex fan blades flatten out at high rpm. Less resistance. Less drain. The clutch fan is thermostatically controlled. Cold, it runs no faster than 1000 rpm. Hot, it engages and picks up to 1800 rpm. All because of a little clutch."

What I can add is that flex fans flex, but that leads eventually to fatigue of the blades and some nasty shrapnel will result. They were recalled a few years back for that very reason.
Clutch fans are great. More efficient for warm-ups, move lots of air at low engine rpm yet they don't have the fan roar at high rpm. If they wear out they can either fail to uncouple completely, or they can do just the opposite.
Electric fans? Sounds like a plan. Just remember that your alternator will add it's own drag to power the electric fan. Energy is neither created or destroyed, it is converted. Hopefully little is lost along the way.
__________________
"Maybe it is just me, but I'd rather not have to clench my teeth and tighten my buttcheeks when the engine is revving." - Slowpoke70


My Showroom
TC Gold #120
Completely stock 67 Malibu Sport Coupe 6 cyl
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #14  
Old Jan 12th, 12, 11:30 PM
1972 El Camino 1972 El Camino is offline
Tech Team
Mark
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 683
Default Re: Thermal vs. Non-Thermal Fan Clutch

For a place like Texas where it never gets colder than 30 degrees (while I'm driving anyway) and most of the time it's HOT weather!
would I go with thermal non-thermal?

Thermal, that,sucker would spin when I need it.
Non thermal, doesn't where out as fast.
Thermal keeps my motor running cooler as I might need it more here in Texas.

I'm thinking thermal.

any more food for though? Agree? Disagree?

Mark
__________________
1972 El Camino SS


4bbl SMI QuadraJet
Performer 2101
Points Distributor
76cc Iron Heads
E274s Cam
1470-080 Dish Top Pistons
Stock Converter
Th350 Trans
Stock Exhaust Manifolds/AIR System/Dual Exhaust
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #15  
Old Jan 13th, 12, 12:45 AM
Schurkey Schurkey is offline
Gold Founding Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: the Seasonally Frozen Wastelands
Posts: 9,492
Default Re: Thermal vs. Non-Thermal Fan Clutch

Direct info from the manufacturer:

http://www.haydenauto.com/Featured%2...s/Content.aspx

Quote:
Non-Thermal Fan Clutch
  • Low cost alternative for some standard thermal clutches.
  • Always engaged, less fuel savings than a thermal clutch.
  • Spins at about 30-60% of the water pump speed.
  • Shorter life expectancy.
  • Cannot replace a heavy-duty clutch.
  • Identified by the smooth, steel faceplate, (without a thermal spring assembly), on the front.
Quote:
Thermal Fan Clutch
  • Varies the fan speed with temperature of the air behind the radiator.
  • Engaged (high speed) operation provides maximum cooling.
  • Disengaged (low speed) operation provides fuel savings and noise reduction.
  • Greater life expectancy than a non-thermal clutch.
  • Briefly engaged at cold start-up.
  • Engages at about 170 radiator air temperature, (about 30 lower than coolant temperature).
There is also a three-page tutorial. Page 1:
http://www.haydenauto.com/Fan%20Clut...1/Content.aspx

Far as I'm concerned, non-thermal fan clutches are junk for people who refuse to spend the money for a real fan clutch.
__________________
.
.
Did you SEARCH BEFORE POSTING a new thread?

Did you post in the correct forum?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply
Chevelle Tech > Mechanical > Engine      Current Topic: Thermal vs. Non-Thermal Fan Clutch
Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Chevelle Tech forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address. Note, you will be sent a confirmation request to this address.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 2:04 PM.


Is there a site like this for?    El Caminos Camaros Novas Impalas GTO Chevy Punch All Chevys

2009 Team Chevelle - AutoForums