holley 3310-2 Vs 3310-4 - Chevelle Tech
Chevelle Tech join team chevelle as a supporting member  
Chevelle Parts at SS396.com      
GROUND UP & SS396.com         
Official Sponsor of Team Chevelle
     

Auto Insurance

Chevelles.com is the premier Chevrolet Chevelle Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Performance Our High Performance area

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old Aug 3rd, 12, 10:42 AM
mkube396 mkube396 is offline
Tech Team
Matthew
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 929
Send a message via AIM to mkube396
Default holley 3310-2 Vs 3310-4

i just got a 3310-4 and i was testing it out and I cant get the secondary to open like my 3310-2 one thing i seen in my 3310-2 is a brass nipple in the primary side that looks to help with vacuum signal to the secondary diagram. The 3310-4 i have looks to be missing this "but there is s hole there".
is this something they eliminated in the new ver? or did it fall out?

Note i am using the short yellow spring
__________________
1981 Chevy monte carlo 396 BBC .060 over 10.25:1 voodoo 60203,
3:42 Posi GTA rims
Holley 750 3310
8.61 1/8 mile on street tires

http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z...uff/monte1.jpg

Last edited by mkube396; Aug 3rd, 12 at 12:10 PM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old Aug 3rd, 12, 12:15 PM
kettbo kettbo is offline
Lifetime Premium Member
George
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, WA
Posts: 10,101
Default Re: holley 3310-2 Vs 3310-4

if the carb is used, perhaps someone has been in there
if new...who knows?

Call Holley Tech, they might know http://www.holley.com/
__________________
George Kettler
o 70 El Camino 454 $2000. 10.5:1, worked 101cc ovals, 2.19/1.88, HR grind, 237/245* .604/.600" 110 SR lifters lashed tight 3000 stall/3.42s 275/60s. 4000# territory 2.5" ext
1.631 11.727 113.37 91.47 midtrack 1.647 11.729 113.49 91.58 mph mid track
Bests 1.620 60 ft 91.60 best mph

now 3.90s and 295/65s for 2014

o 68 Vette 427/M-20/3.36 22 year owner
http://public.fotki.com/kettbo/gearhead/
o 68 Camaro Vert 327 project, painted, assembly stage http://www.camaros.net/forums/showth...183654&page=55
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #3  
Old Aug 3rd, 12, 12:29 PM
64CDNSS 64CDNSS is offline
Tech Team
Mic
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Gilford, Ontario
Posts: 362
Default Re: holley 3310-2 Vs 3310-4

I have a 3310-3 and it does not have the brass nipple - just the hole.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #4  
Old Aug 3rd, 12, 12:44 PM
oman oman is online now
Senior Tech Team
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 4,363
Default Re: holley 3310-2 Vs 3310-4

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkube396 View Post
i just got a 3310-4 and i was testing it out and I cant get the secondary to open like my 3310-2 one thing i seen in my 3310-2 is a brass nipple in the primary side that looks to help with vacuum signal to the secondary diagram. The 3310-4 i have looks to be missing this "but there is s hole there".
is this something they eliminated in the new ver? or did it fall out?

Note i am using the short yellow spring
If I was a betting man I would think that there was a design change to shave a buck or two, or a nickel or a dime, off the cost per unit to manufacture. If the -4 is used versus new well that could be different. As mentioned anything could have happened if it is used. Generally however things are not getting designed to make things better these days so if it is new then I go with my original theory.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #5  
Old Aug 3rd, 12, 1:27 PM
540Hotrod 540Hotrod is offline
Senior Tech Team
JIM
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 4,912
Default Re: holley 3310-2 Vs 3310-4

The nipple will speed up activation. Do you still have the ck ball in the diaphragm can? Positive there are no leaks in the can or mounting gasket to the main body?

JIM
__________________
'67 Vette-Pump gas 555"/Gforce 5 Spd/Dana 60 IRS-3.07's
3850LB

9.90@141.40

http://s318.photobucket.com/albums/m...rrent=Jim3.mp4

http://s318.photobucket.com/albums/m...rrent=Jim4.mp4

"...when it's not pointing at a wall...grab a gear!"

*This Life Stuff ain't no dress rehearsal"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #6  
Old Aug 3rd, 12, 3:21 PM
Dave427 Dave427 is offline
Senior Tech Team
Dave
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ingersoll Ontario
Posts: 7,503
Default Re: holley 3310-2 Vs 3310-4

The nipple does make the vacuum secondary more sensitive, like mentioned see if it still has the check ball in the vacuum secondary housing.

Dave
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #7  
Old Aug 3rd, 12, 11:29 PM
mkube396 mkube396 is offline
Tech Team
Matthew
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 929
Send a message via AIM to mkube396
Default Re: holley 3310-2 Vs 3310-4

First i just installed it every thing was fine flots and set. The idle on this carb so much nicer then my older 3310-2 so is the response.

any way i had the original VS Unit on with the black spring all most didint open mybe 1/8 installed the yellow got 1/4 opening

then i took my hole VS Unit off my 3310-2 with my quick change spring kit. still 1/4 opening.

Yes i have the check ball installed. and it is clean and there is a little relief cut under the check ball to let air bypass it.

all so used Carburetor Cleaner and compressed air to make shure there was no crap in any thing
__________________
1981 Chevy monte carlo 396 BBC .060 over 10.25:1 voodoo 60203,
3:42 Posi GTA rims
Holley 750 3310
8.61 1/8 mile on street tires

http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z...uff/monte1.jpg
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #8  
Old Aug 3rd, 12, 11:31 PM
lg1969 lg1969 is offline
Lifetime Premium Member
Louis
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bohemia, LI, NY
Posts: 1,061
Default Re: holley 3310-2 Vs 3310-4

Do your self a favor, Remove the check ball. In another post I read it was removed and the secondary responded better without any problem. It may bog, It may not.
__________________
Louis
69 Chevelle Malibu Sports Coupe Change to SS
11:1 TR406sbc/AFR227/Comp cam 280HFT/3500 RPM Stall conv./TH 350/12 bolt 410 Gears
Original owner
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCG7lnacgGg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FbCKQlBv0E
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #9  
Old Aug 3rd, 12, 11:32 PM
mkube396 mkube396 is offline
Tech Team
Matthew
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 929
Send a message via AIM to mkube396
Default Re: holley 3310-2 Vs 3310-4

i this week end i am going to swap out the main body witch sucks becus my 3310-2's dont have the blow out protection.
__________________
1981 Chevy monte carlo 396 BBC .060 over 10.25:1 voodoo 60203,
3:42 Posi GTA rims
Holley 750 3310
8.61 1/8 mile on street tires

http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z...uff/monte1.jpg
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #10  
Old Aug 4th, 12, 3:09 AM
Dave427 Dave427 is offline
Senior Tech Team
Dave
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ingersoll Ontario
Posts: 7,503
Default Re: holley 3310-2 Vs 3310-4

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkube396 View Post
i this week end i am going to swap out the main body witch sucks becus my 3310-2's dont have the blow out protection.
Its the baseplate that has the power valve protection, its the brass piece with the ball bearing.

Dave
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #11  
Old Aug 4th, 12, 7:27 AM
mkube396 mkube396 is offline
Tech Team
Matthew
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 929
Send a message via AIM to mkube396
Default Re: holley 3310-2 Vs 3310-4

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave427 View Post
Its the baseplate that has the power valve protection, its the brass piece with the ball bearing.

Dave

cool i was looking this morning and i seen that so i am going to do that.
__________________
1981 Chevy monte carlo 396 BBC .060 over 10.25:1 voodoo 60203,
3:42 Posi GTA rims
Holley 750 3310
8.61 1/8 mile on street tires

http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z...uff/monte1.jpg
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #12  
Old Aug 4th, 12, 10:01 AM
mkube396 mkube396 is offline
Tech Team
Matthew
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 929
Send a message via AIM to mkube396
Default Re: holley 3310-2 Vs 3310-4

Woot I switched the main body and every thing is working as it should! my idle is nice and constant, off idle is crisp, and WOT is opening up the secondaries full with no bog.

The main reason to use the newer carb was my throttle shaft was worn out on the 3310-2 and i got this carb cheep as he didn't need it for his 5.3L lsx
__________________
1981 Chevy monte carlo 396 BBC .060 over 10.25:1 voodoo 60203,
3:42 Posi GTA rims
Holley 750 3310
8.61 1/8 mile on street tires

http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z...uff/monte1.jpg
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply
Chevelle Tech > General Tech Area > Performance      Current Topic: holley 3310-2 Vs 3310-4
Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Chevelle Tech forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address. Note, you will be sent a confirmation request to this address.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:28 PM.


Is there a site like this for?    El Caminos Camaros Novas Impalas GTO Chevy Punch All Chevys

2009 Team Chevelle - AutoForums