383 sbc...are small base circle cams always necessary? - Chevelle Tech
Chevelle Tech join team chevelle as a supporting member  
Chevelle Parts at SS396.com      
GROUND UP & SS396.com         
Official Sponsor of Team Chevelle
     

Auto Insurance

Chevelles.com is the premier Chevrolet Chevelle Forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.
Performance Our High Performance area

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 8th, 04, 2:37 PM
fatmattbbc fatmattbbc is offline
Tech Team
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 65
Post

When building a 383 sbc stroker engine, is it always necessary to use a small base circle camshaft for clearence issues. I am using Scat 6.0 4340 pro I beam rods, designed for stroker engines, these have the ARP 7/16" cap screws. Scat says they are clearenced for stroker engines. Thanks!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2  
Old May 8th, 04, 3:09 PM
bowtie455 bowtie455 is offline
Tech Team
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: pleasant grove,alabama
Posts: 736
Send a message via AIM to bowtie455
Post

i have those exact rods for my 385 stroker smallblock and am hoping for an answer also.i'm thinking only the block will need clearancing.lets keep our fingers crossed!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #3  
Old May 8th, 04, 3:36 PM
Jinks Jinks is offline
Tech Team
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Delta, BC Canada
Posts: 90
Send a message via ICQ to Jinks
Post

ive got a xe294h and i had to clearance my rods a bit. ive got the standard scat 5.7" i beam 4340's
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #4  
Old May 8th, 04, 3:48 PM
Rad Racer Rad Racer is offline
Tech Team
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lakewood WA
Posts: 270
Send a message via AIM to Rad Racer
Post

My 383 did not require special cam clearancing. BUT I am using an old Crane 274H, results may vary. Scat 9000 crank, Eagle SIR 6.0" rods, Crane 274H "3/4 Race cam". My block had to be ground like crazy, but the cam was ok. I will be finding out how it fits with a Comp XE262 in a couple weeks. I hope I don't run into any problems.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #5  
Old May 8th, 04, 4:23 PM
bored&stroked bored&stroked is offline
Tech Team
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Mesa AZ
Posts: 414
Send a message via ICQ to bored&stroked
Post

stock block, comp 280H, scat 9000 crank, stock 5.7's with ARP bolts, I had to sell the comp 280H and order a small base cam......
__________________
Disclaimer: I can't spell.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #6  
Old May 8th, 04, 5:04 PM
sheetmetal sheetmetal is offline
Tech Team
Dave
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: splendora, texas
Posts: 938
Post

scat 5.7 H rods. comp 294hr standard base circle cam. a few of the rod bolts had to have very minor relief work. Ive always thought about the trade offs between the 2 different size cams. theres got to be advantages and disadvantages to both. 2 very good thoughts come to mind. Dave
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #7  
Old May 8th, 04, 5:52 PM
383Malibu 383Malibu is offline
Tech Team
Roger
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Akron, OH, USA
Posts: 800
Post

Quote:
Originally posted by fatmattbbc:
When building a 383 sbc stroker engine, is it always necessary to use a small base circle camshaft for clearence issues. ...
In a word... NO!

We ran a 383 in a stock block with Summit Proline rods with a variety of hydraulic, solid flat tappet and roller cams (with up to .766" lift) and all of them were standard base circle. The key is the rods!
__________________
Roger Copeland
"Only a rich man can afford cheap parts, because he can afford to replace them."
R&R Racing
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #8  
Old May 8th, 04, 7:43 PM
BPOS BPOS is offline
Tech Team
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 46
Post

ZZ4 block, Manley Sportsmaster 4340 Capscrew rods, GMPP HR Hot Cam. - no grinding to the block, very minor grind to a couple of the rods, to provide adequate cam clearance, although none were actually hitting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #9  
Old May 8th, 04, 7:44 PM
bigjimzlll bigjimzlll is offline
Tech Team
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Redding,CA
Posts: 978
Post

even with a mild cam and stroker clearance rods you can have problems..it all depends on the core shift of that particular block...if you look at the front of the block, theres a flat spot where the cam bearing is...the cam is supposed to be centered in that pad...a lot of times you will find its moved down..this can cause clearance problems
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply
Chevelle Tech > General Tech Area > Performance      Current Topic: 383 sbc...are small base circle cams always necessary?
Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Chevelle Tech forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address. Note, you will be sent a confirmation request to this address.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:13 AM.


Is there a site like this for?    El Caminos Camaros Novas Impalas GTO Chevy Punch All Chevys

2009 Team Chevelle - AutoForums