Chevelle Tech join team chevelle as a supporting member  
Chevelle Parts at SS396.com      
GROUND UP & SS396.com         
Official Sponsor of Team Chevelle
     

Registered users (free) do not see these large ads

Performance Our High Performance area

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #16  
Old Nov 5th, 09, 12:10 AM
77 cruiser 77 cruiser is offline
Team Member
Jim
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: International Falls MN
Posts: 3,167
Default Re: Has anyone here modified a non-roller block to accept the fac roll

The only part of it I don't like is having to grind the block in a already crack prone area.
__________________
Jim

77 Monte
385- AFR 190's Clay Smith solid--200-4r w/ 3.73's
67 Imp.SS for the wife 275 hp 327-TH350

http://myweb.midco.net/77cruiser/
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old Nov 5th, 09, 12:28 AM
Jebchevelle Jebchevelle is offline
Lifetime Premium Member
Jeff
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: colorado springs colorado
Posts: 3,064
Default Re: Has anyone here modified a non-roller block to accept the fac roll

Quote:
Originally Posted by victor3ranger View Post
Jeb,

So you used a set of Solid roller lifters with the hyd roller cam?? How long have you run this setup??? What kind of specs do you have on that motor?
It ended up going in a freinds 10:1comp .040 350 with a set of bowtie heads I gave him when I left Ohio. It is currently in a 70 pontiac lemans seeing weekend racing and car shows it has not been in there long about a 2 months. he said runs great so far. Cam was originally for a turbo project. Specs @.050 242/252 lift with stock 1.5 ratio rockers 540in/560ex 114lsa. I planed to use the cam in either a turbo or with N20 but the guy I gave the parts to doesnt run either. So far the car went from 14's with old engine a 355 10:1 with 488 hydro FT cam to 12's with this setup and he says it idles better and he likes it alot. The lash is set at .006 in. hot and .008 ex. hot. thats all he has told me. I gave him all my small block stuff that didnt go with the vega.
__________________
66 chevelle 468 13:1comp. Wolfplace spec cam .274in/.282ex @ .050 .741/.717 109Lsa S/R. 780BG DB. sounds and runs great cant wait to get it to the track. Thanks Mike!
New mustang 09 45thAV v6auto red getting afew bolt on's.
http://www.chevelles.com/showroom/showgallery.php/ppuser/41692/cat/500
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old Nov 5th, 09, 11:00 AM
victor3ranger victor3ranger is offline
Tech Team
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 47
Default Re: Has anyone here modified a non-roller block to accept the fac roll

That's very interesting

I might be able to find a good set of solid roller lifters pretty easy. The ones you are talking about were they the ones with the horizontal bar that has a spring under them???
The cam was a retro fit hyd roller cam right??
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old Nov 7th, 09, 7:43 PM
Speedfreek Speedfreek is offline
Tech Team
Patrick
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Quitman Georgia
Posts: 233
Default Re: Has anyone here modified a non-roller block to accept the fac roll

I did it a while back and got a few negative replies on my block "hack job". It was on a 400 too. It is very easy. Search my old posts and you will find it.

BTW, I out ran a 95 Mustang that had 4.56 gears and a 5 speed just yesterday with my hack job engine. And this is in a 4000lb truck and it runs mid 13's! Engine is still going strong today.
__________________
69RS/SS,383,10.25:1cr,4.10,60ft1.6sec,1/8-7.6sec@88mph,1/4-12.1@110mph,Vicjr.intake,RPMheads,mildport,750dp, Proform main body, cam,246*-250*@.050,.510,522lift,1.6rr,700r4,3200stall
Engine is SOLD
Building a 489BBC!
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old Nov 7th, 09, 8:39 PM
Mikeys69 Mikeys69 is offline
Team Member
/\/\ikey
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 3,709
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via MSN to Mikeys69
Default Re: Has anyone here modified a non-roller block to accept the fac roll

Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedfreek View Post
I did it a while back and got a few negative replies on my block "hack job". It was on a 400 too. It is very easy. Search my old posts and you will find it.

BTW, I out ran a 95 Mustang that had 4.56 gears and a 5 speed just yesterday with my hack job engine. And this is in a 4000lb truck and it runs mid 13's! Engine is still going strong today.
Is this the same block that people were saying it would crack "split"?
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old Nov 7th, 09, 9:39 PM
Speedfreek Speedfreek is offline
Tech Team
Patrick
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Quitman Georgia
Posts: 233
Default Re: Has anyone here modified a non-roller block to accept the fac roll

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikeys69 View Post
Is this the same block that people were saying it would crack "split"?
Yes I think it is. This is my daily driver now and it regularly see's 6k plus blasts and is still running strong.
__________________
69RS/SS,383,10.25:1cr,4.10,60ft1.6sec,1/8-7.6sec@88mph,1/4-12.1@110mph,Vicjr.intake,RPMheads,mildport,750dp, Proform main body, cam,246*-250*@.050,.510,522lift,1.6rr,700r4,3200stall
Engine is SOLD
Building a 489BBC!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old Nov 7th, 09, 10:11 PM
Jebchevelle Jebchevelle is offline
Lifetime Premium Member
Jeff
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: colorado springs colorado
Posts: 3,064
Default Re: Has anyone here modified a non-roller block to accept the fac roll

Quote:
Originally Posted by victor3ranger View Post
That's very interesting

I might be able to find a good set of solid roller lifters pretty easy. The ones you are talking about were they the ones with the horizontal bar that has a spring under them???
The cam was a retro fit hyd roller cam right??
yes to both questions.
__________________
66 chevelle 468 13:1comp. Wolfplace spec cam .274in/.282ex @ .050 .741/.717 109Lsa S/R. 780BG DB. sounds and runs great cant wait to get it to the track. Thanks Mike!
New mustang 09 45thAV v6auto red getting afew bolt on's.
http://www.chevelles.com/showroom/showgallery.php/ppuser/41692/cat/500
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old Nov 7th, 09, 10:58 PM
Calculated Risk Calculated Risk is offline
Tech Team
Rick
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Philadelphia, Pa
Posts: 713
Default Re: Has anyone here modified a non-roller block to accept the fac roll

Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedfreek View Post
I did it a while back and got a few negative replies on my block "hack job". It was on a 400 too. It is very easy. Search my old posts and you will find it.

BTW, I out ran a 95 Mustang that had 4.56 gears and a 5 speed just yesterday with my hack job engine. And this is in a 4000lb truck and it runs mid 13's! Engine is still going strong today.
The Quote below is as funny today as it was when you intially said it:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedfreek View Post
if I had to do this over again I would grind less on the block and more on the dog bones.

Really I would probably just buy the right lifters without grinding my block. I was VERY scared that I was going to grind through the block.

My engine runs great (knock on wood) but I worry daily about the lifter valley cracking.

.

I still stand by it that it's a Hack job, spend a few $$$'s more and have peice of mind... But to the OP, good luck with whatever you do....
__________________
1967 Chevelle Malibu 4 door
353" SBC, Iron Vortec's
S480, Blowthrough Carb
9.574 @ 139.47 on pump gas
8.967 @ 150.38 on race gas

http://s145.photobucket.com/albums/r...t=IMG_2724.jpg

http://gonedragracing.com/gallery/di...um=272&pos=162
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old Nov 7th, 09, 11:38 PM
Wolfplace Wolfplace is offline
Team Member
Mike
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Mendocino County, Northern CA
Posts: 8,886
Default Re: Has anyone here modified a non-roller block to accept the fac roll

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikeys69 View Post
Is this the same block that people were saying it would crack "split"?
=
Although Rick was a bit more blunt than most in the old thread his advice was & still is valid
Also I don't think anyone said it "would" crack.
As I recall what was stated in different ways is grinding in the valley area is a very bad idea

I have scraped blocks & or fixed a number of cracks in this area in the past that had no grinding on them & can tell you for a fact that this area can be very thin on some blocks.
And none of them are real thick.

So as Rick stated,
If you wish to grind here by all means go ahead, it may well never give you grief,,, or it may,,,,
And if it does changing blocks sucks,,,

Bottom line is one or two people on the internet that have done a block still does not make it the best of plans
__________________
Mike (Wolfplace)
VISIT US AT
Lewis Racing Engines
++Now offering full 4axis CNC block machining++
================================
"Life is tough.,, Life is even tougher if you're stupid."

-----John Wayne-----
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old Nov 7th, 09, 11:59 PM
Mikeys69 Mikeys69 is offline
Team Member
/\/\ikey
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 3,709
Blog Entries: 1
Send a message via MSN to Mikeys69
Default Re: Has anyone here modified a non-roller block to accept the fac roll

Cracking http://www.chevelles.com/forums/show...2&postcount=21
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old Nov 8th, 09, 2:50 PM
Speedfreek Speedfreek is offline
Tech Team
Patrick
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Quitman Georgia
Posts: 233
Default Re: Has anyone here modified a non-roller block to accept the fac roll

Must have been a better job than what some of the "experts" thought. It's still going strong today.

I may think the looks of someone's car (specifically) looks like a "hack job". But I'm not that blunt as to say it like this nor am I this rude.

And like I said a long time ago. If I had to do it all over again I think I would grind on the dogbones more and on the block a little less. This is not a funny statement to me.
__________________
69RS/SS,383,10.25:1cr,4.10,60ft1.6sec,1/8-7.6sec@88mph,1/4-12.1@110mph,Vicjr.intake,RPMheads,mildport,750dp, Proform main body, cam,246*-250*@.050,.510,522lift,1.6rr,700r4,3200stall
Engine is SOLD
Building a 489BBC!
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old Nov 8th, 09, 2:58 PM
RB69SS396Conv RB69SS396Conv is offline
Senior Tech Team
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: SW OH
Posts: 1,775
Default Re: Has anyone here modified a non-roller block to accept the fac roll

There's a HUGE difference between "I did it and got away with it", and "you should do it too".

Just because it worked ONCE for SOME ONE PERSON, UP TO NOW, doesn't make it a good idea for SOMEONE ELSE to do it too. For all anybody knows, it could fail tomorrow.

I'm betting that if you tried to do the same thing to 10 blocks, at least 3 of them wouldn't make it past a pressure test before building; and probably at least one of the ones that "appeared" successful at the conclusion of the mod, wouldn't make it past the first 1000 miles. Not real good odds.

In other words, there's a HUGE difference as well, between "it's a good thing to do", and "I just got lucky this time".

Those distinctions seem to get lost in Internet advice alot of the time.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old Nov 8th, 09, 4:48 PM
Calculated Risk Calculated Risk is offline
Tech Team
Rick
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Philadelphia, Pa
Posts: 713
Default Re: Has anyone here modified a non-roller block to accept the fac roll

Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedfreek View Post

I may think the looks of someone's car (specifically) looks like a "hack job". But I'm not that blunt as to say it like this nor am I this rude.
I'm not rude, i'm honest. What you are telling people to do is a hack job.

And my "hack job" car that your refering to, went a new best mph of 152.4 and then backed it up with a 152.3 yesterday, and that was at 3,630 lbs, Iron vortec heads and on a 275 radial. And I didn't have to grind my block, or worry daily about it cracking daily....


The numerous people who stop by to see my car after each run think a small tire street car that looks like mine and runs 8's at over 150 mph is cool, not hacked...
__________________
1967 Chevelle Malibu 4 door
353" SBC, Iron Vortec's
S480, Blowthrough Carb
9.574 @ 139.47 on pump gas
8.967 @ 150.38 on race gas

http://s145.photobucket.com/albums/r...t=IMG_2724.jpg

http://gonedragracing.com/gallery/di...um=272&pos=162
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old Nov 8th, 09, 5:06 PM
Wolfplace Wolfplace is offline
Team Member
Mike
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Mendocino County, Northern CA
Posts: 8,886
Default Re: Has anyone here modified a non-roller block to accept the fac roll

Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedfreek View Post
Must have been a better job than what some of the "experts" thought. It's still going strong today.

I may think the looks of someone's car (specifically) looks like a "hack job". But I'm not that blunt as to say it like this nor am I this rude.

And like I said a long time ago. If I had to do it all over again I think I would grind on the dogbones more and on the block a little less. This is not a funny statement to me.
=
Patrick
You still don't get it do you
Did you even bother to read what I said above instead of being so concerned about the way Rick presented the truth?
It was nothing to do with a "better job" at all
It was just something you got away with that time.

Again you may not like the presentation but blunt or not that does not make the message wrong,,,,
And sometimes it appears being blunt or "rude" as you call it seems to work better as apparently the only thing you got out of or remembered regarding anything anyone said about the way you did it was the message from Rick
Maybe it was just "tough love"

Hell, according to what you said even you seem realize it is not the best plan,,
so why are you still defending the way you did it or recommending doing it?

Anyway,,, like I said,,,
If it cracks changing blocks really sucks

=============EDIT===================

Patrick
I just read the last three posts here that appear to be kind of hammering on you & I just want to say that was not my intent, this is not intended to be some kind of personal attack on you

My intent is to let people who are considering doing this know the possible consequences if all does not go as planned & nothing more simply because I know for a fact how thin this area can be in some blocks as does anyone who has had experience with a number of these blocks over the years
__________________
Mike (Wolfplace)
VISIT US AT
Lewis Racing Engines
++Now offering full 4axis CNC block machining++
================================
"Life is tough.,, Life is even tougher if you're stupid."

-----John Wayne-----

Last edited by Wolfplace; Nov 8th, 09 at 6:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old Nov 8th, 09, 5:31 PM
Calculated Risk Calculated Risk is offline
Tech Team
Rick
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Philadelphia, Pa
Posts: 713
Default Re: Has anyone here modified a non-roller block to accept the fac roll

and not to pile on, but when i say your block is a hack job, keep in mind i have not said a single derogatory word about you personally, or your car. You may think i'm rude and that fine, but sooner or later someone will try this mod in an effort to save a few bucks and it will cost them a block.
__________________
1967 Chevelle Malibu 4 door
353" SBC, Iron Vortec's
S480, Blowthrough Carb
9.574 @ 139.47 on pump gas
8.967 @ 150.38 on race gas

http://s145.photobucket.com/albums/r...t=IMG_2724.jpg

http://gonedragracing.com/gallery/di...um=272&pos=162
Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 9:47 AM.


© 2009 Team Chevelle - AutoForums