LAFNRAT632
Jul 31st, 05, 1:54 AM
Hey guys, in all this hipe about my "suspicious L-78" Chevelle it never occured to me to check for myself on what was been argued about the build sheet issue. Here's the email i got that really got me worried.
It reads: Sir..what you are saying is Authentic Documentation for this Chevelle in your other auction,is indeed homemade paperwork.
There are so many red flags on the buildsheet,it is ridiculous.The 1970 L-78 Chevelle was not built past the first week of December 1969.The VIN# for this Vehicle is shown in the plant records as being built in the end of May,1970,yet your buildsheet is showing April 1970.The CJ coded rear is a 3:55 NON Posi call out,yet your buildsheet is saying it's a 3:31 Posi.
The 3:31 Rear was not possible behind the 1970 L-78 Chevelle.
The Carburator call out of HH is indeed a Rochester suffix,not a Holley,as was standard on the L-78.There are many more inaccuracies on this buildsheet.
Can you please explain these? End.
In this email he points out that the carb code on my build sheet is "HH" for a Rochester but i looked for myself and it is in fact "GG BG" on the build sheet and then he says the rear end code on the sheet is "CJ" for a 3.55 non posi but on the sheet it's actually "KJ" . So it obvious he was not looking at the sheet right and has me very concerned about it's authenticity.Are the codes i posted right for what they should be. I also received another email from another gentlemen that explained that you could order just about anything if they had it available and if someone thinks that if they had a 396-375hp motor available and someone wanted it that they wouldn't process that order then they're fools[they being GM], and that it is very possible that a L-78 Chevelle made it out after the beginning of the year. So as you can see i'm very confused and afraid i might be giving a very rare car away way to cheap. Is there a web site i can go to and do some research that will break down these codes for me because at this point i don't feel comfortable with the info i've been given alone to make a educated dicission. Any help is greatly appreciated. Also in the email i posted he says "in the plant records" where can i view this info, thanks again Mike.
It reads: Sir..what you are saying is Authentic Documentation for this Chevelle in your other auction,is indeed homemade paperwork.
There are so many red flags on the buildsheet,it is ridiculous.The 1970 L-78 Chevelle was not built past the first week of December 1969.The VIN# for this Vehicle is shown in the plant records as being built in the end of May,1970,yet your buildsheet is showing April 1970.The CJ coded rear is a 3:55 NON Posi call out,yet your buildsheet is saying it's a 3:31 Posi.
The 3:31 Rear was not possible behind the 1970 L-78 Chevelle.
The Carburator call out of HH is indeed a Rochester suffix,not a Holley,as was standard on the L-78.There are many more inaccuracies on this buildsheet.
Can you please explain these? End.
In this email he points out that the carb code on my build sheet is "HH" for a Rochester but i looked for myself and it is in fact "GG BG" on the build sheet and then he says the rear end code on the sheet is "CJ" for a 3.55 non posi but on the sheet it's actually "KJ" . So it obvious he was not looking at the sheet right and has me very concerned about it's authenticity.Are the codes i posted right for what they should be. I also received another email from another gentlemen that explained that you could order just about anything if they had it available and if someone thinks that if they had a 396-375hp motor available and someone wanted it that they wouldn't process that order then they're fools[they being GM], and that it is very possible that a L-78 Chevelle made it out after the beginning of the year. So as you can see i'm very confused and afraid i might be giving a very rare car away way to cheap. Is there a web site i can go to and do some research that will break down these codes for me because at this point i don't feel comfortable with the info i've been given alone to make a educated dicission. Any help is greatly appreciated. Also in the email i posted he says "in the plant records" where can i view this info, thanks again Mike.