Rich-L79
May 13th, 03, 11:16 AM
The information contained in this post is solely my opinion. This post is a follow up to the thread I started about a week ago concerning value (asking price) of old cars as relating to originality. This post will contain my thoughts on the subject and are not meant to insult anyone or offend anyone they are merely observations of what I see as unproductive trends in the old car hobby.
As some of you may know, I've been on a hunt to find a new classic car. Even before this search began I had noticed trends concerning value on cars for sale but it was a distant irritation since I personally wasn't in the market. Well now that I am actively in the market the irritation level has increased dramatically.
To refresh, the previous topic started like this:
"Let's say you are looking at two identical 1965 Malibu SS cars. Neither car has an engine or transmission and the originals are long gone. One has a history of having been an L79 car and one has a history of only being a V8 car (let's say it had a 300hp/327ci originally to keep things as similar as possible). Neither car has paperwork but their histories are not in question. Condition, options, etc. are all the same on the two cars. If you buy either one you can hot rod them or build them as a date-correct restoration or whatever you like. Would you be willing to pay more the the L79 car than the other one? If so, why? If you were selling them would you ask a higher price for the L79 car? If so, why?"
Before my search for a 2-door wagon began I had read an ad for a particular '65 2-door wagon. The thing was a full blown race car with wheel tubs in the rear, a roll bar and a wild big block engine. The car was rough around the edges and the price was incredibly high. The cause for the high price? Not so much the value of the race car drivetrain or that it was a 2-door wagon, but that it was originally an L79 car. Well big deal I thought. The original engine is long gone, the car is absolutely nothing like it was originally and it would be incredibly costly to try to restore the car to even a correct appearing date correct car especially considering the asking price for the car itself not to mention the cost of rebuilding the body and chasing down all the correct components.
In the end, I have absolutely no idea why the fact that the car was originally an L79 car had any bearing on it's perceived value. (No wonder that car is STILL for sale almost 2 years later.)
More recently I have been looking at two '65 2-door wagon project cars. One of them got me very excited as it was reported to be an original L79 car. The engine was pulled in 1965 but reportedly the original engine was mostly intact and available with the car! The asking price was rather steep but imagine what an original L79 2-door wagon would be like to own! Simply incredible. I simply had to have that car. The other car available was just as solid, just as complete (both were projects not drivers) but the second car was priced less than half as much as the L79 car (both from the same seller).
As the story unfolds it turns out that the L79 car either was not originally an L79 car or the engine that is with it is not the original engine. The engine that is with the car has some L79 parts on it but the numbers indicate a 250hp/327ci. The car is still incredibly solid and would be a great basis for a project. The seller still believes the car to be an original L79 car regardless of what the engine codes say (he now acknowledges the engine must not be the original engine). In short, the price of this car will not be budged and he continues to try to find a home for the car with the understanding it is an original L79 car.
Personally, I believe the engine IS the original because the dates match the car and the engine codes match the car and that it simply was made into an "L79" back in the day but was originally a 250hp car in reality. The original owner was a mechanic at a Chevy dealership and could have built his own "L79" for all I know. The seller also got a little frustrated with my drop in interest after the engine information was determined.
Maybe it's just me trying to be self serving (I'd still like to own the car but at a purchase price more in line with what it is now known to be or not to be) but I do not understand why the seller is maintaining the incredibly high asking price for a car that is either not what it is claimed to be or at the very least does not any longer have the original drivetrain. I am still interested in buying the other car he has for sale since the price is more reasonable and it's drivetrain is a long gone mystery so I could simply hot rod it to my personal delight without being concerned with originality.
But in general I have recently seen LOTS of cars being sold as original this or that "but the original drivetrain is gone". I simply do not understand asking a premium for a car that is simply no longer what it is claimed to have been originally. In my mind an LS6 car is an LS6 car because of the LS6. Doesn't that make sense? I personally don't see a lot of difference in value between an original LS6 car with a non original LS6 and an original L34 car which now has a non original LS6. Both are great cars but not any different in value.
I'm not saying a car without it's original parts (and my L79 car has lots of non original parts in the body!) has no value. What I am saying is that an original L78, LS6, L79 or whatever car certainly loses a good portion of it's hertigage value (in respect to restoration) if the original stuff is gone.
Agree or disagree?
As some of you may know, I've been on a hunt to find a new classic car. Even before this search began I had noticed trends concerning value on cars for sale but it was a distant irritation since I personally wasn't in the market. Well now that I am actively in the market the irritation level has increased dramatically.
To refresh, the previous topic started like this:
"Let's say you are looking at two identical 1965 Malibu SS cars. Neither car has an engine or transmission and the originals are long gone. One has a history of having been an L79 car and one has a history of only being a V8 car (let's say it had a 300hp/327ci originally to keep things as similar as possible). Neither car has paperwork but their histories are not in question. Condition, options, etc. are all the same on the two cars. If you buy either one you can hot rod them or build them as a date-correct restoration or whatever you like. Would you be willing to pay more the the L79 car than the other one? If so, why? If you were selling them would you ask a higher price for the L79 car? If so, why?"
Before my search for a 2-door wagon began I had read an ad for a particular '65 2-door wagon. The thing was a full blown race car with wheel tubs in the rear, a roll bar and a wild big block engine. The car was rough around the edges and the price was incredibly high. The cause for the high price? Not so much the value of the race car drivetrain or that it was a 2-door wagon, but that it was originally an L79 car. Well big deal I thought. The original engine is long gone, the car is absolutely nothing like it was originally and it would be incredibly costly to try to restore the car to even a correct appearing date correct car especially considering the asking price for the car itself not to mention the cost of rebuilding the body and chasing down all the correct components.
In the end, I have absolutely no idea why the fact that the car was originally an L79 car had any bearing on it's perceived value. (No wonder that car is STILL for sale almost 2 years later.)
More recently I have been looking at two '65 2-door wagon project cars. One of them got me very excited as it was reported to be an original L79 car. The engine was pulled in 1965 but reportedly the original engine was mostly intact and available with the car! The asking price was rather steep but imagine what an original L79 2-door wagon would be like to own! Simply incredible. I simply had to have that car. The other car available was just as solid, just as complete (both were projects not drivers) but the second car was priced less than half as much as the L79 car (both from the same seller).
As the story unfolds it turns out that the L79 car either was not originally an L79 car or the engine that is with it is not the original engine. The engine that is with the car has some L79 parts on it but the numbers indicate a 250hp/327ci. The car is still incredibly solid and would be a great basis for a project. The seller still believes the car to be an original L79 car regardless of what the engine codes say (he now acknowledges the engine must not be the original engine). In short, the price of this car will not be budged and he continues to try to find a home for the car with the understanding it is an original L79 car.
Personally, I believe the engine IS the original because the dates match the car and the engine codes match the car and that it simply was made into an "L79" back in the day but was originally a 250hp car in reality. The original owner was a mechanic at a Chevy dealership and could have built his own "L79" for all I know. The seller also got a little frustrated with my drop in interest after the engine information was determined.
Maybe it's just me trying to be self serving (I'd still like to own the car but at a purchase price more in line with what it is now known to be or not to be) but I do not understand why the seller is maintaining the incredibly high asking price for a car that is either not what it is claimed to be or at the very least does not any longer have the original drivetrain. I am still interested in buying the other car he has for sale since the price is more reasonable and it's drivetrain is a long gone mystery so I could simply hot rod it to my personal delight without being concerned with originality.
But in general I have recently seen LOTS of cars being sold as original this or that "but the original drivetrain is gone". I simply do not understand asking a premium for a car that is simply no longer what it is claimed to have been originally. In my mind an LS6 car is an LS6 car because of the LS6. Doesn't that make sense? I personally don't see a lot of difference in value between an original LS6 car with a non original LS6 and an original L34 car which now has a non original LS6. Both are great cars but not any different in value.
I'm not saying a car without it's original parts (and my L79 car has lots of non original parts in the body!) has no value. What I am saying is that an original L78, LS6, L79 or whatever car certainly loses a good portion of it's hertigage value (in respect to restoration) if the original stuff is gone.
Agree or disagree?