|
mapleaf Jul 29th, 03, 3:12 PM I was just wondering, as a not very savvy engine guy, if it was bad to run the engine or to drive without a flywheel dust cover? Thanks for any responses, Mapleaf 1968 Chevelle SS 396/350 Stikman33 Jul 29th, 03, 3:43 PM They are good to run with. I have run for a year though without one before, no ill effects. Daniel mapleaf Jul 29th, 03, 3:47 PM Thanks for the reply. Have you or anyone heard of any problems occuring without one? Mapleaf 1968 Chevelle SS 396/350 Midnight Marauder Jul 29th, 03, 3:52 PM Originally posted by mapleaf: Thanks for the reply. Have you or anyone heard of any problems occuring without one? Mapleaf 1968 Chevelle SS 396/350 Only if one goes mudbogging and or plowing fields. I have run without one for over 4 years just because I am lazy and have not experienced any problems. 4-door Chevelle Jul 29th, 03, 5:30 PM With the pain of headers I never put mine back on ... 20 years without an issue. mapleaf Jul 29th, 03, 6:39 PM Thanks for the replies guys. I just wanted to know the facts about any unforseeable problems. Mapleaf 1968 Chevelle SS 396/350 graemlins/thumbsup.gif graemlins/beers.gif chev64 Jul 30th, 03, 8:25 AM In the great state of MD, the car won't pass safety inspection without one. Midnight Marauder Jul 30th, 03, 11:30 AM Originally posted by chev64: In the great state of MD, the car won't pass safety inspection without one. Why? Are they worried someone will crawl under the car and turn the motor with a screwdriver or something? What are the possible safety problems of not running one? I feel for you guys out in MD. You have politics and regulations right up there, if not exceeding that of California and that should scare you. chev64 Jul 30th, 03, 7:26 PM I guess they are afraid that something will jump up and get jammed it there???????? graemlins/sad.gif | ||