|
: Shortened height on Rear Lower Poly/Roto Arms? oldzy Aug 5th, 11, 2:53 PM Is it just me or was the height on these arms shortened a bit? http://www.umiperformance.com/catalog/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=2_32_37&products_id=375 http://www.umiperformance.com/catalog/images/large/4041a_LRG.jpg BB68 Aug 5th, 11, 6:50 PM Hard to tell without a stock one sitting beside it. Looks like a very nice piece. oldzy Aug 5th, 11, 7:05 PM Here are the other boxed ones... http://www.umiperformance.com/catalog/images/large/3021a_LRG.jpg http://www.umiperformance.com/catalog/images/large/3042a_LRG.jpg Kirk's67SS Aug 23rd, 11, 9:25 AM I would say they look like they have been put on a slim plan, as the grease fitting is fully exposed in the newer version . I bought the UMI Perf 64-67 GM A Body Rear Lower Boxed / Adj Upper Control Arms # 402126 with Greaseable Poly Bushings for my car . Love them, no wheel hop and they look strong & great . UMI Performance Aug 31st, 11, 2:17 PM Yes they have been. We changed them last year because our Roto-Joint now features an external lock instead of an internal lock. We couldn't use the external lock with the larger boxed tubing. I hope that helps, Ryan | ||