3.5" max backspacing if using 2" drop spindles [Archive] - Chevelle Tech

: 3.5" max backspacing if using 2" drop spindles


nambesal
Sep 15th, 02, 7:48 PM
I was just reading the new Nov. 2002 issue of Chevy High Performance. In the article "Stop, Drop, and Roll" it states that if you use 2 inch drop spindles with 16 or 17 inch wheels the max backspacing you can use is 3.5 inches, otherwise the wheels will hit the tie-rod ends. Is this true?

This has me conserned because I've been planning on getting 17 X 7 wheels with 4 inch backspacing for the front of my 66 chevelle and possibly adding drop spindles and disk brakes as a future upgrade.

Is anyone using drop spindles with a backspacing larger then 3.5 inches?

[This message has been edited by nambesal (edited 09-15-2002).]

Redrum
Sep 16th, 02, 12:09 AM
4.75 inches with 18 inch wheels on my 69. I have a slight rub on the 1 1/4 inch sway bar and I do mean slight with no mark on the tire but some scratches in the paint on the bar. I have 255's on 8 inch wide wheels.

I would have to go look to see if the tire rods clear into the wheel like the shock tower on the rear......


------------------
I want to die in my sleep like my grandfather...

68 Corvette - 383 CI 427 HP
69 SS Chevelle being updated to Pro-Touring
97 Z-28, less than 14,000 miles on it!

Not screaming and yelling like the passengers in his car.

[This message has been edited by Redrum (edited 09-16-2002).]

andrewb70
Sep 17th, 02, 6:33 PM
I think that is a misprint in the magazine. I think they meant to say that you can only go with 3.5 inch backspacing with 15 inch rims. The bigger the wheels, the more clearance there is for tie rods. I have almost the same set up as Redrum. I have 255/45/18s on 18X8 wheels with 4.5 in backspacing. I have 2 inch dropped spindles and there are no issues with the tierods. There is TONS of room.

Andrew

nambesal
Sep 18th, 02, 7:19 PM
Thanks guys. I didn't think the 3.5 max sounded right.