MarkM
Mar 16th, 04, 10:38 AM
I haven't really looked at my chevelle or mocked anything up to see if this is physically possible.
But what I'm thinking, since the tall spindle does provide a better camber curve, but some don't like the bump steer it also ads. Would it be possible to lower the upper control arm mounting location? And retain the stock spindle.
First gen Camaro guys do this all the time, I did it on mine, it's called the "Guldstrand" mod. It moves the control arm down about 3/8" and back some, for a better camber curve, and increased caster. And it really helps the camber curve. This is done by either re-drilling the holes for the studs, or some have completly cut off the control arm mount, chopped 3/8" off, moved it back some, and then re-welded it back to the frame,
Has anyone ever tried this on a Chevelle? Is it possible?
But what I'm thinking, since the tall spindle does provide a better camber curve, but some don't like the bump steer it also ads. Would it be possible to lower the upper control arm mounting location? And retain the stock spindle.
First gen Camaro guys do this all the time, I did it on mine, it's called the "Guldstrand" mod. It moves the control arm down about 3/8" and back some, for a better camber curve, and increased caster. And it really helps the camber curve. This is done by either re-drilling the holes for the studs, or some have completly cut off the control arm mount, chopped 3/8" off, moved it back some, and then re-welded it back to the frame,
Has anyone ever tried this on a Chevelle? Is it possible?