How (In)accurate is a Sun Super Tach supposed to be? [Archive] - Chevelle Tech

: How (In)accurate is a Sun Super Tach supposed to be?


lesscubes
Aug 1st, 09, 3:22 AM
So I was fiddling with the ratio calculator on the Richmond site and according to the thing, at 60mph, 2800rpms in top gear with a 27.6 inch tire, I've got a 3.73 axle. (It says "Estimated 3.77 rear gear")

It also says, I'd have to be turning 2290rpm to have a 3.08 gear which is what I've always assumed I had, the car isn't quick off the line and doesn't spin tires so It can't be a 3.73.

So, when I buzzed the car up to 6200rpms, I was actually turning 6700? I don't know if I'm to be impressed or terrified.

Dave
Aug 1st, 09, 3:24 AM
I dunno about that, jack up the rear and do the rotation test.

lesscubes
Aug 1st, 09, 3:43 AM
If it is a 3.73 I'm going to have to rethink everything. lol.

Juhosaphat
Aug 1st, 09, 1:08 PM
I dunno about that, jack up the rear and do the rotation test.

Only way you'll know for sure :yes: And with an almost 100% stock 283, you could very well have 3.73's and not even know it lol

66 Buick Special
Aug 3rd, 09, 11:53 AM
Jim,

I'm just thinking that my combo is way off on those calculators too, but I think its due to the converter slipping at cruise speed.

I'm running approx 3300rpm @ 60mph with 3.90 gears and 29" tires.

If you plug those numbers in you will see they don't match up.

Just something to consider.

lesscubes
Aug 3rd, 09, 5:21 PM
That makes sense Greg, hadn't thought of that.

Come to think of it, I've seen one of those calcs that had a input for converter slippage %, can't remember where though. (Or how you'd guesstimate the percentage of slip.)