Trading LS6 Rectangles for ported Ovals? [Archive] - Chevelle Tech

: Trading LS6 Rectangles for ported Ovals?


68SS454
Sep 17th, 04, 3:44 PM
All this talk about rect vs ovals has my head spinning!

The general Concensus is that the Ovals are a better street/strip head.

I have a neighbor that wants my Ls-6 (crate motor) heads, and hes willing to trade me a set of ovals for em.

The Ovals are 702's, the Rects are stock ls6 style heads.

Would I see a gain in performance with the ovals?
And more importantly, can I even bolt these one with my pistons? (SRP 10.25:1)

68SS454
Sep 17th, 04, 3:57 PM
Oh, and combo is

496
10.5:1 compression
Ls6 heads milled .020
Lunati Solid Roller 292* 300*, 260* 268* @.050 .685 lift
Victor Jr Single plane (i still have the ls6 intake)
Holley 950hp
2" hooker super comps

Rmchevelle
Sep 17th, 04, 4:52 PM
What's your current performance?

slpin
Sep 17th, 04, 4:53 PM
i would sell the rect heads and use the money from it to buy ovals.... that is if you want ovals...

BillsCamino
Sep 17th, 04, 4:57 PM
With those cubes and cam, keep the rectangle ports.

68SS454
Sep 17th, 04, 5:02 PM
Originally posted by Rmchevelle:
What's your current performance? Current performance is....
Unknown. The track in my neck of the woods is pretty far, and I havent had a chance to take her up there yet.

Itll smoke the tires from a 30mph though,as long as you want, with 275/60r15 Bfgs

My first 2 gears are pretty useless, even with the drag radials. :D tongue.gif

Motor Martyr
Sep 17th, 04, 5:21 PM
2-3 tenths.

GM iron oval ports worked by the right hands are good up to 700hp and 7000rpms! Which means they're perfect for a street/strip application

Is the 702 a closed or Open chamber?

sschevellefan
Sep 17th, 04, 5:25 PM
the 702 is a early 396/427 head with about a 96cc chamber. they would give to about another point of compression.

68SS454
Sep 17th, 04, 5:38 PM
There closed chamber.
Nearest I can figure, they'll give me about 11.3-.5 compression. Im fine with running better gas, but I want to make sure these heads will really give me better performance...
Are all ovals really equal?
What are Ed's ovals? Ive heard you can hit water jackets really easy with these heads..

Doug F.
Sep 17th, 04, 5:52 PM
If you don't race at the track and can't hook up now why bother?

68SS454
Sep 17th, 04, 6:06 PM
Originally posted by Doug F.:
If you don't race at the track and can't hook up now why bother? I normally run at the 1/8th mile thats about 45 min from here, but I havent gotten her down there with the new motor. With the ls6 crate in bone stock form, I ran a 7.9. Unfortunatley, the track only has Reaction time and et on there slips

I also have some 28x12.5 et streets on the way,
and some new suspension pieces (qa1 adjustable shocks, dick miller rear suspension pieces)

jakeshoe
Sep 17th, 04, 6:55 PM
On a 496 cube motro cammed up that size I think the rectangulars are a better head...

I'm an oval fan, and even used them for my 505 motor but with a mellower camshaft and slightly less compression.

I doubt you will gain anything with the ovals in this case. If you had fewer cubes, or lesser cam maybe.

I also doubt you would lose much using a ported oval with the same size valves too... Jut not worth the trouble or expense of the swap with your combo.

sschevellefan
Sep 17th, 04, 7:04 PM
i would probably use the rectangle heads also for that motor but oval are good too. there are peanut ports to stay away from but most of the other oval ports are about the same size. try www.mortec.com (http://www.mortec.com) for head specs.

68SS454
Sep 17th, 04, 7:36 PM
Hm.. thanks for the replies guys..
Got some decision making to do. tongue.gif

Mike Feudo
Sep 17th, 04, 7:43 PM
Which LS-6 head? 291s or 880s. The crate motors came with either. I have gone really fast with a mildly ported set of 291s (faster than a set of alum raised ex port heads)

68SS454
Sep 17th, 04, 7:49 PM
Its a later set of heads, the block is stamped 7.4L,
and the heads have Hi-Perf cast on em,
Ill get the casting #'s when I get home.
I think it was the predecessor to the modern 454 HO crate motor...
10:1 compression and solid lifter cam, GM dual plane, etc.
Im pretty sure there 880's

GRN69CHV
Sep 17th, 04, 8:47 PM
This will be an unpopular response, but I would be inclined to change the GM rec Ports for aftermarket raised exhaust runner rec ports. Otherwise, work on your suspension to actually make the car quicker.

m71
Sep 17th, 04, 9:05 PM
one thing i see that nobody touched yet, the crate 454 rec ports are open chambered, and the oval ports in question are closed chambered, if you have open chambered design pistons the oval ports won't work, at least not without cutting on the pistons.

68SS454
Sep 17th, 04, 9:39 PM
6272990
Heres the casting number.... stamped "hi-perf"

10secBu
Sep 17th, 04, 9:56 PM
Why would you take heads off and change if you haven't run the car with the current heads?

If it were me, I'd run the car as is and see how it does and if your satisfied with how it performs. If you wanna go faster at that point, then maybe look into a different set of heads.

If yours are currently open chamber and you need/want to keep the compression the same, then search out a set of 049 or 781 heads large oval heads.

BTW, the 990 head is a popular performance head. I would NOT trade them even up for the oval ports your neighbor/friend offered. You can easily sell your heads for more than his are worth.

EDIT: Sorry, didn't see his heads were ported. I assumed they were stock castings in need of reworking. Either way, run the car and get a baseling of it's current performance, then make your decision about a possible head swap.

Purs
Sep 17th, 04, 10:12 PM
If you can wait until tomorrow night I will be able to tell how a pair of 702's perform on a 461 (I'm headed to the track).... They've got the big valves and have been mildly worked. The guy that did the head work didn't act like he was worried about hitting the water jacket, but he said he thought that a pair of open chambered heads (like yours or 781's, 049's, etc...) were more efficient....

sschevellefan
Sep 17th, 04, 10:15 PM
if you got 990 casting heads, then the 702`s won`t work. like stated by another member, open chamber pistons won`t work with closed chamber heads. you can run closed chamber pistons with open chamber heads. i would stay with the 990`s. my buddy had them on his low 11`s 9 to 1 454 and then low 10`s when he bumped the compression to 12.5 to 1. just do a little bowl work and maybe a gasket match on the intake and you should have a pretty good running motor.

68SS454
Sep 17th, 04, 10:27 PM
Thanks for the replies guys,

10secbeu- I will get a baseline first, I just get impatient sometimes tongue.gif

sschevellefan- That was one of my big q's, thanks.

Purs- let us know how she runs!

I think im going to stick with my 990's for now, and maybe save for a set of AFR's down the road. graemlins/thumbsup.gif

Motor Martyr
Sep 17th, 04, 10:34 PM
Why not have the 990's reworked with epoxy to make an oval port, perferably done by someone whose got alot of experience in doing such work.

68SS454
Sep 17th, 04, 10:36 PM
Motor Martyr :confused:
never heard of such a thing graemlins/clonk.gif

Motor Martyr
Sep 17th, 04, 10:50 PM
:D send me an email i'll refer you to someone who can do the work.

68SS454
Sep 17th, 04, 10:59 PM
Motor Martyr.. youve got mail!

GRN69CHV
Sep 17th, 04, 11:12 PM
I have seen intake runners reshaped like that, but I was unaware that they did heads that way. I would assume what they do is raise the floor and fill in the corners to get an oval shape.

68SS454
Sep 17th, 04, 11:31 PM
Id never heard of it before, but im quite interested

Azurefine69
Sep 18th, 04, 1:38 AM
Definately keep the 990's for that combo.

Ron454
Sep 18th, 04, 2:09 AM
Oh gads.
Keep the 990's. Maybe have them pocket ported by someone who knows what they are doing.
Sure oval port heads can work real well, but only when ported by the right person. There is more to it than slapping in the bigger valves.
If you really want to make more power.....do some research and buy something from the aftermarket.
Ron