Greg
Oct 11th, 08, 9:59 PM
Every now and then I'll read a post out here about VIN tags...suspect or phony looking VIN tags (I was reading one today), and I've commented about a VIN tag "situation" that came to light in my area last year.
I thought I'd give that "situation" its own thread, so as to make as many people aware of it as possible.
Last year in the area of North Carolina that I live in, it came to light that a "team" of guys had been taking pre '69 136 VIN Chevelles and swapping out the 136 VIN tags for 138 VIN tags.
The cars were then titled with the North Carolina DMV as 138 VIN Chevelles (which was VERY easy to do here before North Carolina tightened up the way old cars were inspected and titled starting in 2008).
I'm not sure if these guys were using re-stamped fake 138 VIN tags or if they were getting them off of "basket case" Chevelles in salvage yards, although two of the guys in this "team" worked at salvage yards, actually one of them owns a salvage yard, so I'm assuming they were 138 tags off of junked Chevelles.
Anyway, these newly titled Chevelles were then sent out to wherever and sold as 138 VIN Chevelles...either in North Carolina, or else taken to other states and retitled there and then sold.
It's not known exactly how many Chevelles this was done to...but these guys had apparently been working this moonlighting "job" for quite a while.
What's really surprising though is that when this caper came to light with the N.C. DMV, these guys only got a slap on the wrist.
Apparently the N.C. DMV is concerned with VIN swapping inasmuch as it applies to concealing or selling stolen cars. Once the DMV ascertained that this had nothing to do with stolen cars, they handled the guys with kid gloves.
I heard that the two guys were even still at their salvage yards.
Apparently, if it has nothing to do with attempting to conceal stolen cars, the DMV has more important things to do than to be overly concerned with the difference vetween a 136 prefix and a 138 prefix on a 40 year old car (as some Chevelle afficiondos are).
This makes me wonder though, how many of these "138 VIN" cars are sitting in guys garages...guys who are content in the knowledge that they have a 138 VIN Chevelle???
In light of deceit such as this (and I'm sure there are many more similar instances that have gone on, and are going on, in other areas), how can a guy be sure...beyond a shadow of a doubt...what he has, unless he personally knows the history of the car?
Regards,
-Greg
I thought I'd give that "situation" its own thread, so as to make as many people aware of it as possible.
Last year in the area of North Carolina that I live in, it came to light that a "team" of guys had been taking pre '69 136 VIN Chevelles and swapping out the 136 VIN tags for 138 VIN tags.
The cars were then titled with the North Carolina DMV as 138 VIN Chevelles (which was VERY easy to do here before North Carolina tightened up the way old cars were inspected and titled starting in 2008).
I'm not sure if these guys were using re-stamped fake 138 VIN tags or if they were getting them off of "basket case" Chevelles in salvage yards, although two of the guys in this "team" worked at salvage yards, actually one of them owns a salvage yard, so I'm assuming they were 138 tags off of junked Chevelles.
Anyway, these newly titled Chevelles were then sent out to wherever and sold as 138 VIN Chevelles...either in North Carolina, or else taken to other states and retitled there and then sold.
It's not known exactly how many Chevelles this was done to...but these guys had apparently been working this moonlighting "job" for quite a while.
What's really surprising though is that when this caper came to light with the N.C. DMV, these guys only got a slap on the wrist.
Apparently the N.C. DMV is concerned with VIN swapping inasmuch as it applies to concealing or selling stolen cars. Once the DMV ascertained that this had nothing to do with stolen cars, they handled the guys with kid gloves.
I heard that the two guys were even still at their salvage yards.
Apparently, if it has nothing to do with attempting to conceal stolen cars, the DMV has more important things to do than to be overly concerned with the difference vetween a 136 prefix and a 138 prefix on a 40 year old car (as some Chevelle afficiondos are).
This makes me wonder though, how many of these "138 VIN" cars are sitting in guys garages...guys who are content in the knowledge that they have a 138 VIN Chevelle???
In light of deceit such as this (and I'm sure there are many more similar instances that have gone on, and are going on, in other areas), how can a guy be sure...beyond a shadow of a doubt...what he has, unless he personally knows the history of the car?
Regards,
-Greg