question about stroking a 396 [Archive] - Chevelle Tech

: question about stroking a 396


VooDoo427
Feb 11th, 04, 12:24 PM
our plans are to stroke a 396 using the 454 crank trying to figure out if we use a 396 style rod or use the 454 rods to add for the extra stroke?

1966_L78
Feb 11th, 04, 12:48 PM
Aren't all BB rods (stock) are the same (same length)?

Its the pistons that have different pin locations, depending on stroke...

GRN69CHV
Feb 11th, 04, 1:16 PM
Just went through this whole deal. Keith Black makes a piston with the correct compression ht. For info go to www.kb-silvolite.com. (http://www.kb-silvolite.com.) Piston is listed as Chev 434. Uses stock GM 6.135 rod and 454 crank. You will have to have the assembly balanced and the 396 block will require a fair amount of grinding to clear the crank counterweights. After exploring this, adding it all up, including bore/hone, cost of crank, balance, new balancer and flexplate- I said to heck with it and stayed with my .030 over 402. I had checked around and spoke to KB direct - the pistons are not in stock in any overbore, best estimate for delivery was sometime in March. If you have an early block, I would suggest stay with the stock 3.76" stroke and bore out to 427 size. If you have to do a lot of work to your block in the process {decking, cam bearings, line hone, boring} and you want the longer stroke motor, I would strongly suggest you set the 396 aside and get a 454 block to work with. I my case, the 402 based block had already been decked and line honed - we kept the same pistons, so all we needed was new rings. The estimated tab for the pistons, crank, additional machine work, parts, etc., etc. was about 1000.00. For a gain of 26CI, 1000.00 is far too much money for that gain IMHO. Good luck.