Who's running a 283 eng? Are you happy with the performance? [Archive] - Chevelle Tech

: Who's running a 283 eng? Are you happy with the performance?


66 Chevelle Bob
Apr 25th, 08, 4:08 PM
I'm a 66 Chevelle 396 SS guy and mabey a 65 Chev II owner also. Here's the question: This Nova ( non-SS ) has a 283 mildly hopped up with a Turbo 350 trans. This Sport Coupe is immaculate, no rust, new RED paint, new RED interior with a freshly rebuilt 283 and a Edelbrock Intake with Carb. It's a light car so i'm thinking the small block with the Turbo will be enough for driving around town, highway and cruises...Any comments? How many are happy with there 283's or disappointed..?

Bob in sunny CT

68KMENO
Apr 25th, 08, 4:21 PM
it should run GREAT !!! even with a very mild 283 :D

an it will keep you smiling every time you pass a gas station !!!

Haggs65
Apr 25th, 08, 4:46 PM
It really depends on what you want it for. It sounds like a good fit if you will be using it for driving around town and cruising. My Chevelle has a bone stock 283 and it runs great! However I am treating this projects as a restoration / cruiser rather than a hot rod drag car. With your 66 396 and the 65 283, it sounds like you will have the best of both worlds...

pdq67
Apr 25th, 08, 6:43 PM
Imho, the old 195 and 220hp/283's are dandy little engines!!

The 195 is the 2-barrel carb/single exhaust engine and the 220 is the 4-barrel, duals Power Pack engine.

You install no more than an old STOCK Duntov, solid lifter cam in a Power Pack 283 engine and it will really COOK!!

pdq67

Keith Tedford
Apr 25th, 08, 7:14 PM
My first car was a new 283 automatic '66 Beaumont. The engine was more than willing but the PG killed it. Naive farm kid not wise to the musclecar scene yet. :( My buddies bought new 275 hp 327 Chevelles and could get 3-4 mpg better than I could on the highway. I even installed a new Carter AVS carb and intake. Still 20 mpg (Imperial) was my best. I didn't know much about carbs and distributors back then so mileage probably could have been improved with a little tuning. Just being a small block Chevy speaks for itself. In a light Chevy II it should perform very nicely. ;)

depley
Apr 25th, 08, 7:23 PM
Back in the early 70s I had a 64 chevelle ss with a 283. Performance was ok, even with a powerglide. It was bored to 301 and had a bunch of other stuff done to it. All it was capable of was pushing it down the 1/4 mile at 13 seconds flat at 104 mph. And yes this was my daily driver, not a race car.

dgwar
Apr 25th, 08, 10:05 PM
My 65 runs just great and gets fair gas mileage for a fun car.

64SS427
Apr 25th, 08, 10:49 PM
I have a std bore 283 block I've been saving for years with the intent of slapping a set of 11:1 pistons into with 305 58cc heads and a 327/375 hp cam I have laying around just to see how it will run. I don't expect it will have torque like my BB, but boy will it scream, and being a small block and I have most the pieces already, I could do it on the cheap.

Devin

658Chevy
Apr 26th, 08, 4:06 AM
Back in the early 70s I had a 64 chevelle ss with a 283. Performance was ok, even with a powerglide. It was bored to 301 and had a bunch of other stuff done to it. All it was capable of was pushing it down the 1/4 mile at 13 seconds flat at 104 mph. And yes this was my daily driver, not a race car.

13 seconds flat is not bad -- that's in the neighborhood of an LS2 Corvette.

MalibuSeaS
Apr 26th, 08, 9:26 AM
The 283 will do fine in a 65 Chevy II or a Chevelle but IMHO I would change it to a 4 speed (much more fun in a DD). I'm now running a 283 (bored to a 301), fuelie heads (worked), a radical cam (292) a 4 barrel Holley and HEI ignition in my 65 Malibu SS. I runs very strong and sounds great (a little heavy on the gas though).

pdq67
Apr 26th, 08, 10:13 AM
Ah, my old junk301!!

He, He!!

Sucker did cook once "up on the pipe" as the 2-stroke guys say!

pdq67

66 Chevelle Bob
Apr 27th, 08, 11:33 AM
I'm beginning to think from your replys, that a freshly souped up 283 with a four barrel would be enough power in a light 65 chevy II with a Turbo 350. The car only weighs 2650 so hopefully it should be fine ripping around town or on the turnpike. Not as much torque as my 396 but not as much weight either since I have a Convertible. I do like the 65 Body Style and believe it's the next collectible car down the road, but who knows..

Bob

pdq67
Apr 27th, 08, 2:23 PM
Sucker will be a hoot w/ a 283 and a BIGGER HOOT w/ an L-79, 350hp/327 in it!!

You can go big car eating w/ onna them in it!

pdq67

Sandy
Apr 27th, 08, 11:10 PM
I had a 66 Chevelle back in the old days with a 195 hp 2 bbl 283, muncie 4 spd and 3.7 gears. It was a blast.

I have an original un-opened 67 283 sitting on a crate, ready for rebuild.

The rats belong at the track........the mouse is a great street motor.

MalibuSeaS
Apr 28th, 08, 7:56 AM
I do like the 65 Body Style and believe it's the next collectible car down the road..
Bob
:yes::yes: :thumbsup::thumbsup:

The rats belong at the track........the mouse is a great street motor.
:yes::yes: :thumbsup::thumbsup:

GRN69CHV
Apr 28th, 08, 10:11 AM
A T350 will help a bunch. 283's suffered with the gearing of a Glide which really hurt the bottum end. For a cruiser, I would leave it.