LarryC5
Aug 23rd, 04, 11:25 PM
I was thinking about dropping the compression ratio of my BB502 from 10.2-1 to about 9.8-1 due to the 91 octane gas that is avaialble here in California (Bay Area).
The engine came from the builder (Sallee Chevrolet) with Edelbrock Victor Jr. CNC ported heads that have 110cc chambers.
I called AFR for advice and they recommended a set of their CNC ported 315 heads but stated I should leave the compression at 10.1 to maintain the power (motor dynoed at 630hp). Although, they did say their heads will produce more power than the Vics.
Basically, I went no where with my original quest to drop the compression. Then it hit me. Maybe go for the 121cc AFRs and install a centrifugal super charger.
My quesation is two fold:
1. Will the AFRs produce enough additional power to help offset the cost assuming they machine the heads to match my current compression ratio?
2. If I do go with the AFRs and use the 121cc chamber size can I run a centrifugal supercharger with a compresssion ratio at ~9.1 which was estimated by AFR based on the Vics chamber size?
Thanks,
Larry
The engine came from the builder (Sallee Chevrolet) with Edelbrock Victor Jr. CNC ported heads that have 110cc chambers.
I called AFR for advice and they recommended a set of their CNC ported 315 heads but stated I should leave the compression at 10.1 to maintain the power (motor dynoed at 630hp). Although, they did say their heads will produce more power than the Vics.
Basically, I went no where with my original quest to drop the compression. Then it hit me. Maybe go for the 121cc AFRs and install a centrifugal super charger.
My quesation is two fold:
1. Will the AFRs produce enough additional power to help offset the cost assuming they machine the heads to match my current compression ratio?
2. If I do go with the AFRs and use the 121cc chamber size can I run a centrifugal supercharger with a compresssion ratio at ~9.1 which was estimated by AFR based on the Vics chamber size?
Thanks,
Larry