.036 piston to head clearance safe? [Archive] - Chevelle Tech

: .036 piston to head clearance safe?


rat affair
Sep 1st, 06, 4:32 PM
Anyone have experience running a quench tighter than .040? The reason I ask is that my JE flat top pistons/Eagle H beam/scat crank/AFR210 with 68cc chambers 383 has a piston to deck height ranging from .008 to .011. I have the GM .028 head gaskets and would like to use them, only if I won’t have any problems with running .036-.039 quench.

I think my only other option is to run the .039 head gasket but then I am going into the .050 quench height.

What to do?

mgt999
Sep 1st, 06, 5:18 PM
your cam will have an impact on this....

BigRed-L72
Sep 1st, 06, 5:31 PM
I`d say you`re good to go with the GM .028 gasket. I wouldn`t hesitate to use them for one second.
And the cam won`t have anything to do with it, so don`t worry about that.

kjett
Sep 1st, 06, 5:46 PM
My new 540 has a .038" quench. Pistons are .008 in the hole and I'm using a .030" Cometic MLS gasket. Ran fine on the dyno. Steel rods. I measured every piston with an indicator and magnetic deck bridge to arrive at the largest measurement (furthest down in the hole).

pdq67
Sep 1st, 06, 9:23 PM
.035" to .045" and you are go to go, imho..

pdq67

540Hotrod
Sep 1st, 06, 10:49 PM
I'm at .028 on my 540. Yes they just barely kiss the heads and leave little shiny polished spots. But it runs good!

JIM

Mike Feudo
Sep 1st, 06, 11:05 PM
We ran .028 for years. You could read .030 in the carbon on the head deck but no problems.

mgt999
Sep 1st, 06, 11:13 PM
I`d say you`re good to go with the GM .028 gasket. I wouldn`t hesitate to use them for one second.
And the cam won`t have anything to do with it, so don`t worry about that.


Maybe I'm confused, but how does cam timing have nothing to do with piston to valve clearance? I guess I don't see how anyone can just say with a doubt he will be fine. He should check it.

greg etts
Sep 1st, 06, 11:42 PM
Does it matter how much clearance is in the crank bearings. I am building a SJ 327 right now and am trying to figure quench.Was listening to a couple books recommend .030 clearance for SJ cranks

rat affair
Sep 2nd, 06, 12:22 AM
Maybe I'm confused, but how does cam timing have nothing to do with piston to valve clearance? I guess I don't see how anyone can just say with a doubt he will be fine. He should check it.


No, I think you have a valid concern about the p to v clearance needing to be checked. But what you didn’t know is that I am going from .575 lift on both lobes to .525 and .543 respectively. The engine used to see more strip than street. Now I want to drive the thing.

Thanks for all of the replies, now I’ll be able to relax as I get into the accelerator.

Wolfplace
Sep 2nd, 06, 12:35 AM
Maybe I'm confused, but how does cam timing have nothing to do with piston to valve clearance? I guess I don't see how anyone can just say with a doubt he will be fine. He should check it.

=
Probably because p/v clearance & quench clearance are two entirely different things :D

Camaro_fever68
Sep 2nd, 06, 1:14 AM
From the research I did when building, most agree as .035 to be safe and a little tighter to be o.k. even though it may leave shiny spots on the heads.