Re: 89 camaro sub frame work for a 66 chevelle
Without being a total jerk, this is one idiotic idea. I will tell you why
1) Gen3 Camaros arent exactly known for their superior handling. Even in their time they werent corner carvers, so spending the amount of time and money on just getting that suspension on the car is like running the Boston Marathon backwards, admirable to some but bewildering to most.
2) There is much more aftermarket support for an A body as far as handling equiptment and it works a lot better than whats available for a 3rd Gen.
3) If all you are doing this for is R&P steering, there are companies that make ready to go kits that get you that without any cutting. Unisteer is the one that best fits that application and the one Id use.
Beyond that, I seriosly hope you are joking cause this is probably one of the worsy conceive ideas Ive ever heard of. Now it you said I have a DSE subframe for a 1st gen then Id be giving a few thumbs up but since you arent I think you need to shelve this horribly assembled idea.
1964 Malibu 5.3 LS twin turbo aka Maliboost coming soon BUT YOU WONT SEE IT HERE