GTO parts on a Chevelle Yes? No? - Chevelle Tech
2000 Tech postings from 2000

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
post #1 of 18 (permalink) Old Mar 6th, 00, 6:16 AM Thread Starter
Tech Team
Bob
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Fairport, NY
Posts: 155
My son and I went to see a 69 GTO. (It would have been my son's his first car.) The enthusiasm was running high in both of us but it was a major dissapointment. The drive train was still very strong but the rest was a basket case. Lots of rust and there was not one item in the interior that was salvageable. (It is amazing the amount of damage mice can do to an interior!)

There is the possibility that the guy will part out the car. I'm interested in some of the parts for my '69 Chevelle, specifically the posi-rear, the front disc brakes, and the bucket seats. Will these work on my Chevelle.

The buckets on this car have the release high in the middle of the seat back, not a lever low on the bottom edge as I remember the seats in my first '69 Chevelle. (There is no question that these seats are original but I'm wondering if the GTO might not have been a 69.)

Thanks in advance.

Bob
RDJunc is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 18 (permalink) Old Mar 6th, 00, 7:26 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Posts: 8,508
The brakes are a sure thing. The rear axle will fit the car, but might require a different length propeller shaft.
The seats would be no more difficult than putting in Chevelle seat, but you will have to address the different appearance between the the Chevelle and Pontiac upholstery. That is, the patterns available for the GTO seats will probably not match the Chev interior design and may be solved by getting a whole set of GTO interior parts.
JWagner is offline  
post #3 of 18 (permalink) Old Mar 6th, 00, 7:36 AM
Tech Team
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Reykjavik Iceland
Posts: 144
Sure why not?If i had a GTO like that i wouldn´t hesitate to stuff the drivetrain into my 307 Malibu,and use all the good stuff like disc brakes,swaybars,posi,console,buckets.
I say,go ahead
HR
halldor is offline  
post #4 of 18 (permalink) Old Mar 6th, 00, 8:39 AM
Senior Tech Team
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 4,743
The seat frames are the same, you just need to order the correct covers for a Chevelle. I'm not sure about the plastic seat back covers. I think you can repros in the correct color.
Randy Mosier is offline  
post #5 of 18 (permalink) Old Mar 6th, 00, 12:59 PM
Tech Team
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Syracuse
Posts: 70
Is it a BOP or Chevy posi rear? If it's a BOP rearend, be forewarned. It is commonly thought that these rear-end's are not as strong as the Chevy versions. While they are fine for mild to moderate motors, they are not recommended for high HP situations.

Does it have a hood tach or a guage cluster with a tach? I am looking for either one to put on my 68 LeMans.

------------------
Ted Stojkovski
Syracuse NY
Team Chevelle #172

[This message has been edited by Tedster (edited 03-06-2000).]
Tedster is offline  
post #6 of 18 (permalink) Old Mar 6th, 00, 7:17 PM
Tech Team
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 498
Tedster, the Pontiac Buick 10 bolt rear end is much stronger than the Chevy 10 bolt. The Pontiac Buick 10 bolt has bolt in axles and a stronger pinion gear. These rear ends hold up under the high torque of the big Buick and Pontiac engines. The rest of the GTO parts will work in a Chevelle.
Ken K is offline  
post #7 of 18 (permalink) Old Mar 6th, 00, 8:14 PM
Senior Tech Team
Chevelle Doctor
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ft Wayne In.
Posts: 12,763
PLus these rears use a 4-pinion posi carrier if they have the posi. Most all GTO's have either 3.55 gear without A/C, and 3.23 gear with A/C. The seat frames are the same, 69-72. All bucket seats 69-72 had the pushbutton in the middle of the seatback. Only the bench seat had the low outside release lever.
Is the Pontiac a 4-speed or auto??

------------------
'70 LS6
'69 Camaro Indy Pace Car
'68 Elky 396/375 M22
'69 Chevelle SS396/375
Wanted- '70 GTO Judge!
Dave Birdwell is offline  
post #8 of 18 (permalink) Old Mar 6th, 00, 10:01 PM
Tech Team
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Syracuse
Posts: 70
You guys are absolutely right. The BOP 8.2 inch 10 bolt posi is superior to the 8.2 inch Chivvy 10 bolt. And while the 8.2 works, most people will tell you that when building a 10 bolt for strength, the 8.5 inch "corporate" rear is the way to go.

The "corporate" ring gear is 8.5 inches as compared to 8.875 for the 12 bolt. That's a difference of only .3750 inches. When we compare the 8.2 inch ring gear to the 12 bolt, we see a difference of .675 inches (over a half inch difference!!!). I'm not 100% on this but I beleive that they introduced 8.5's during the 70 model year and discontinued the 8.2's in the 72 model year.

While there is such a thing as a 8.5 inch BOP rear, it's pretty much obsolete and really shouldn't be considered for serious performance applications.

Just my opinion.

------------------
Ted Stojkovski
Syracuse NY
Team Chevelle #172

[This message has been edited by Tedster (edited 03-06-2000).]
Tedster is offline  
post #9 of 18 (permalink) Old Mar 7th, 00, 4:29 AM Thread Starter
Tech Team
Bob
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Fairport, NY
Posts: 155
The car has a 400 CID motor but with a 2B carb. The shifter is on the column but with the 400 trans. (Go figure. There are decisions that some people just shouldn't be allowed to make! Like I said, the motor is still very strong, supposedly having been rebuilt 35K ago. The trans and rear have also been done, supposedly.

This guy is owner #2. #1 is also local and the car was purchased local. (NE of Philadelphia)

I would then assume that the rear is beefy enough for my Chevelle to replace my 2 hundred something rear gears connected to my PowerGlide (to be a TH350 eventually).

I didn't even bother to worry about the guages since it would be a real project and not something for my 15 year old son to get involved with. I don't even recall which ones it had or if they worked. I figure they did work. It was surprising how much in that car did work given its condition, even the key buzzer!

Oh, I forgot to mention. He wanted $1500 for the whole shebang. (Or is that chibang, or shibang?)
RDJunc is offline  
post #10 of 18 (permalink) Old Mar 7th, 00, 10:34 AM
Tech Team
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Syracuse
Posts: 70
If you decide to buy it, I'd be interested in some of the parts. If you have no use for the poncho motor/trans combo, I'd be willing to take it off your hands for you. Also, if it does have a hood tach and/or tach guage cluster, I'd be willing to take that off your hands also.

But, $1500 is steep for a parts car. From what you said, the body and interior are for the most part, scrap. That leaves the drivetrain. $3-500 for the motor/trans combo, $300 for the rearend and $200 for the brakes. Offer him no more than $1000 and you'll at least break even.

but I'm definetly interested in the parts.

------------------
Ted Stojkovski
Syracuse NY
Team Chevelle #172
Tedster is offline  
post #11 of 18 (permalink) Old Mar 7th, 00, 4:29 PM Thread Starter
Tech Team
Bob
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Fairport, NY
Posts: 155
He wanted $1500 for a car he felt was worth putting back on the road. I'm the one that suggested that it should be parted out.

It does not have a hood tach. My son remembers that it did have a tach in the instrument cluster and it did work.

If anyone is interested in any of these parts, email me with what you want. Include your name, address, phone number and email address. I will put a list together and let this guy know what parts you all are interested in. (I won't give out your information to him unless you want me to.) If he does part the car out, I'll let you know.

I'm only interested in the disc brakes, the bucket seats and the rear end.

Bob
RDJunc is offline  
post #12 of 18 (permalink) Old Mar 8th, 00, 9:43 PM
Cam
Gold Founding Member
Cameron Milne
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,251
If that GTO is an original 400-2 barrel regular fuel engine, then it will have smaller ports tha the 4 barrel versions. It will also have tall gearing if it is original, like 2.78:1 or 2.93. No rear sway bar until '70. The parts should fit.
Cam is online now  
post #13 of 18 (permalink) Old Mar 9th, 00, 2:09 AM
lev
Tech Team
Lev
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: winchendon, MA
Posts: 429
I thought all GTO were 4bbl, and the LeMans could be had as a 2bbl
lev is offline  
post #14 of 18 (permalink) Old Mar 9th, 00, 5:50 AM
Tech Team
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Reykjavik Iceland
Posts: 144
So did i,had a Haynes manual ranging US made cars from 1964-1972,and the 400 in that manual stated 4bbl. for the 400 installed in the Tempest,326 & 350 eng. had 2bbl,if memory serves me correctly.
Just my opinion :confused
halldor is offline  
post #15 of 18 (permalink) Old Mar 9th, 00, 6:10 AM Thread Starter
Tech Team
Bob
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Fairport, NY
Posts: 155
Oh its all original all right. You have got to see this car. The original owner had the oddest logic for selecting the options in that car. He said he wanted it to have "get up and go" but also good gas mileage. Hence the 400 CID w/ the 2B.

Another odd choice was the shifter on the column but with bucket seats. Go figure.

Good point about the rear end. I know it is a posi. (We test drove it in a construction yard that was compacted dirt. Both wheels spun when jumped on it just a bit.) But I don't know what the ratio is.
RDJunc is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
 

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Chevelle Tech forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address. Note, you will be sent a confirmation request to this address.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome