Re: Reviews on Lunati 60103 cam please
This is my brother's car, and yes, I told him, and the people at edelbrock told him to use a 3,000 RPM stall speed, but he insisted on the 2,500 RPM stall when he ordered the converter, so I don't doubt that it's hurting his combo. There's no way I'm gonna get him to use the 60104, because it looks like I'm gonna have to twist his arm just to go with the 60103, because he thinks it too radical. He's a stock kinda car guy, but deep down inside, he knows that stock sucks when it comes to performance as compared to many aftermarket applications. But he's convinced that the reason why this Edelbrock RPM cam is a poor performer for a street car is simply because it's too radical, and I think that he's all wrong about that. It's just a poor design.
But because he has himself convinced that this Eddy cam is too big, he really dragging his feet about the whole idea of using the 60103 cam, and has been thinking about the 60102 cam instead, and I've been telling him that he has too much static compression for the 60102 cam.
70 Chevelle SS clone (632 CI powered).