Stock High-rise intake on LS6/L78 in 70?? - Chevelle Tech
1999 -- Tech Files - reference area
1000's of previous topics

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
post #1 of 7 (permalink) Old Jun 13th, 99, 12:50 PM Thread Starter
Tech Team
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Spring Hill,FL U.S.A
Posts: 233

I remember reading somewhere that 2 aluminum intake manifolds where offered on the 396/375 and 454/450 engines in the 1970 Chevelles.If I recall the article said early L78 and LS6 Chevelles came through with left over L72 intakes.I have seen many LS6/L78 Chevelles with the low-rise but never a documented high-rise.Anybody out there have or seen a factory stock 70 LS6/L78 with the high-rise???


Earth Mover
260 is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 7 (permalink) Old Jun 13th, 99, 1:24 PM
Senior Tech Team
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Huber Heights, Ohio , U.S.A.
Posts: 1,669
I once heard that you had one of these in early 1970 if you did not get Cowl Induction.
plain 69 is offline  
post #3 of 7 (permalink) Old Jun 13th, 99, 4:14 PM
Tech Team
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Alton,MO, USA
Posts: 285
The reason Chevrolet switched aluminum intakes on all the big block engines was due to the low hood restrictions of the Corvette. The books I have read stated that the Chevelle was the only car that had enough clearance for the high rise intake, but that the cowl hood was built to accomidate the low rise intake unit, while the L-72 is a high rise unit. The high rise unit supposedly breathed a little better.

Not sure about the leftover L72 intake thing, although, they are the same intakes, except the LS-6 is a low rise, and GM has been known to kinda mix up parts, so...?

Rob Clary
'70 LS-6 Chevelle
Team Chevelle Gold Member #85
Interested in Yenkos or other dealer built muscle cars then go here:

[This message has been edited by Chevy454 (edited 06-13-99).]
Chevy454 is offline  
post #4 of 7 (permalink) Old Jun 13th, 99, 4:57 PM Thread Starter
Tech Team
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Spring Hill,FL U.S.A
Posts: 233
My LS6 Chevelle has a spacer between the carb and air cleaner base.This is to seal the air cleaner against the hood on cowl induction cars.A friend of mine has a 396 with cowl induction.He put a high-rise manifold on with no clearance problems at all.All he did was remove the spacer.


Earth Mover
260 is offline  
post #5 of 7 (permalink) Old Jun 13th, 99, 5:23 PM
Senior Tech Team
Chevelle Doctor
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Ft Wayne In.
Posts: 13,019
I seriously doubt if any LS6 cars came with a high rise intake, as the LS6 was not released until November (I believe this is the month. What's the earliest LS6 date code known???)
A hi-po mag told a story recently that the L78 was only available until the LS6 was released in late '69
As a side note, the '69 Vette 427/390 horse used a low-profile aluminum q-jet intake.
Dave Birdwell is offline  
post #6 of 7 (permalink) Old Jun 13th, 99, 5:51 PM
Gold Founding Member
Cameron Milne
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,681
Reguarding the low rise intake, let's not for get the 70 Camaro SS396 with the L78. They had low hood clearance and had a lot to do with the switch to low rise intakes. They only made 600 of the 2nd generation Camaros with the L78 though.
Cam is offline  
post #7 of 7 (permalink) Old Jun 14th, 99, 4:52 AM
Lifetime Founding Member
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Mooresville, IN (Indianapolis)
Posts: 13,531
If any high rise alum intakes made it through in 1970, it was probably very few. I bought a new L78 1970 Nova in Sept '69 and it had the low rise alum intake. '69 L78 Novas had the high rise unit. von
von is offline  
Sponsored Links

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Chevelle Tech forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address. Note, you will be sent a confirmation request to this address.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Old Thread Warning
This Thread is more than 6588 days old. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
If you still feel it is necessary to make a new reply, you can still do so though.

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome