Jetting vs. cfm - newby question - Chevelle Tech
1999 -- Tech Files - reference area
1000's of previous topics

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
post #1 of 2 (permalink) Old Dec 13th, 99, 5:45 PM Thread Starter
Senior Tech Team
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 1,525
A simple question - is jet size contingent on cfm? Namely if I find a particular jet size works well in a 750cfm, I assume that a correspondingly larger jet size would be right in an 850.cfm Yes?
Gene Chas is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 2 (permalink) Old Dec 13th, 99, 6:23 PM
Tech Team
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Cypress,Texas
Posts: 738
Gene, I think without putting the motor on a dyno, you are really going to have to go by spark plug color and seat of the pants feel. I always move in either direction in increments of two jet sizes until I find the right 'zone' and then jet to within one number. A 100 cfm carburator increase on the same motor may not even require more fuel because it really depends upon the 'air pumps' (engine) displacement and how much the motor is asking for. If the carb change is the only upgrade, then the engine should be asking for the same amount of air. If it worked well on the 750, then go with the same jet sizes on the 850.

Get a baseline feel for how the engine performs, and then expirement with larger or smaller jets. Plug color is always a good indicator...I always shoot for a dark to medium brown color on the center electrode. Good luck and hope this helps some.

1970 Malibu - 383 'Fog Fed' Stroker! Houston, Texas...Gold Member #39
Now looking for a 70' ragtop to... "Drop a Gear and Disappear!"
Wes Colby is offline  
Sponsored Links

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Chevelle Tech forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address. Note, you will be sent a confirmation request to this address.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Old Thread Warning
This Thread is more than 6405 days old. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
If you still feel it is necessary to make a new reply, you can still do so though.

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome